destiny doesnt exist

HECTOR WILL NOT REPLACE ME

when was this proven

After reading this, I think I found what I missed.

Destiny and free will are compatible

i need to read on bells theorem

destiny exists, he is the platonic ideal form of a cuckold

u guys are overanalyzing the wrong things

@Nerthulas the sex was kinda weird, kinda threw me off. But it was good.

you forgot *midget

tomorrow lets talk on it

i have a final in 10 hours

https://twitter.com/catholic_goy/status/1204953354926866432?s=20

Ok, reading that made it much better.

@Rogal Dorn out of context quote:

this video is actually the clearest explanation of bells theorem ive ever seen too

not too shabby

LMFAO

fken saved

Before I turn off my brain and take a shower, why do you think philosophy is downstream of quantum mechanics?

Also, @Deleted User ,reeeee. lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xfBw1bbV4k

because philosophy hinges on implicit notions like realism and causality and quantum mechanics can give us real insights into these questions.

on a micro level

we at a macro big brain level

Philosophy starts at relativistic standards

No it cant

there can be no objectivism but from the outside

which is God

If a quantum system were perfectly isolated, it would maintain coherence indefinitely, but it would be impossible to manipulate or investigate it. If it is not perfectly isolated, for example during a measurement, coherence is shared with the environment and appears to be lost with time; a process called quantum decoherence. As a result of this process, quantum behavior is apparently lost, just as energy appears to be lost by friction in classical mechanics.

https://tenor.com/view/putin-nuclear-bomb-cloud-mushroom-gif-13637840

In my opinion, the distinction between philosophy and science is kind useless because they are just forms of knowledge. In my opinion, we integrate philosophy into science. The philosophy which we don't integrate into science is what we call philosophy.

If the world was perfect, it would be perfect

But it isn't so it is not

We only make that distinction to distinguish our method.

<:honkpilled:558686758875824130>

Decoherence has been used to understand the collapse of the wave function in quantum mechanics. It provides an explanation for apparent wave-function collapse, as the quantum nature of the system "leaks" into the environment. That is, components of the wave function are decoupled from a coherent system and acquire phases from their immediate surroundings. A total superposition of the global or universal wavefunction still exists (and remains coherent at the global level). Decoherence provides an explanation for the transition of the system to a mixture of states that seem to correspond to those states observers perceive. Moreover, our observation tells us that this mixture looks like a proper quantum ensemble in a measurement situation, as we observe that measurements lead to the "realization" of precisely one state in the "ensemble".

Quantum nature, woah, let me check if there's a chapter on that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_decoherence

This is why I lean towards the many worlds interpretation

too bad it can't explain the collapse :)