I’m all for facism

no, that's not socially constructed

The living race

and if it is

academics please respond

then that term is imprecise

My point is that it’s socially constructed. Don’t be autistic and defend that point.

and is being used in various ways

nope

@marstomper you there?

@Nerthulas all definitions are socially constructed.

don't concede linguistic territory pointlessly

Language is a social construct, yes?

you are withdrawing on linguistic territory

doesn't matter

whether it is or not

<:virgin:396572545610022914>

because that's not what the term means in the public discourse

nobody cares about your own private philosophical working definitions

what matters is the way terms are used in the public discourse

It does, because this point is useless to the debate. You won’t convert anyone to race realism arguing if it’s socially constructed or not. Even if it is, I’ll concede the point 10/10 times to more the debate forward.

I wouldn’t support fascism, just monarchism

the way 'social construct' is used in the public discourse, it is used in order to indicate that something has little or no underlying reality outside of the way that it is treated by human societies

btw I'm not reading your messages

I'm just explaining to you, not arguing with you

Whats happening

I missed the whole day in Stardew Valley

<:impotentrage:552803856535257090>

<:why:638779720015675405>

what would be the american monarchy then smart one

NPC logic: social construct = 100% environmental meaning __no genetics__

1. Do you think if it’s socially constructed or not is a meaningful position or not? I think it’s worthless because the leftist talking point to keep the debate from moving any where.

based and pee pee poo poo pilled

I’m more concerned with actually convincing people.

based and sunshine pilled

I’m just saying monarchism > fascism

Race as a definition is socially constructed.

America would need a military dictatorship

Fascist Monarchy FTW