@Smoke smoke The point is, act in our interests. To me, that means become great, conquer, take what we please from outgroups when we can. If the chain of events after destroying Iran led to our downfall, I wouldn't support it. I'm making a simple point: we should conquer. That is my ideal, but you are being slippery. Do you want to be an imperial Aryan badass country or not? Is that your ideal?

build a wall of drones

Than you go fight battles 1000s of miles away

Because the enemy is 1000's of miles away

the nearest enemy

But for the Ameris, the enemy is 0 miles away

@Chaos but we arent

*our* interests

there are no active enemy fighters shooting at people, the appearance of peace is there

clear thing

its not our empire

its theirs

(((theirs)))

and they can do whatever they want tomorrow

security first!

Security security security

they can take all your belongings tomorrow

global humanist security empire

JF retweeted this so I'm going to make an N-word exception @esotericpazuzuism
|| https://twitter.com/BigDwayne21/status/1213547033690353665 ||

as part of asset forfeiture

@Chaos 1. We aren’t conquering. Not even remotely founded in reality. 2. Think of cause and effect. What would we actually gain (or lose) from this aggression/occupation

Imao

Recycling stuff I see

the term is mililtary hegemony

Military Hegemony for what

durr we so strong

our militaries everywhere

dude

your an idiot

hurrrrrr we can waste billions of dollars on bombing u

I’m not against intervention or even military hegemony

you'r

@Smoke should we close our bases all around Iran/middle east and come home?

sure

@Smoke#83smo

why not

lets ignore the facts

durr u idiot why u no likey neo-con

Iranian N-word Cunt Evacuation Limited

INCEL

let's go guys