Message from @themiddleman🐸
Discord ID: 663573235228606464
what secure?
or anything
Thats only if your core is secure
we kill our own people
@Smoke smoke The point is, act in our interests. To me, that means become great, conquer, take what we please from outgroups when we can. If the chain of events after destroying Iran led to our downfall, I wouldn't support it. I'm making a simple point: we should conquer. That is my ideal, but you are being slippery. Do you want to be an imperial Aryan badass country or not? Is that your ideal?
build a wall of drones
Than you go fight battles 1000s of miles away
Because the enemy is 1000's of miles away
the nearest enemy
But for the Ameris, the enemy is 0 miles away
@Chaos but we arent
*our* interests
there are no active enemy fighters shooting at people, the appearance of peace is there
clear thing
its not our empire
its theirs
(((theirs)))
and they can do whatever they want tomorrow
security first!
Security security security
global humanist security empire
JF retweeted this so I'm going to make an N-word exception @esotericpazuzuism
|| https://twitter.com/BigDwayne21/status/1213547033690353665 ||
as part of asset forfeiture
@Chaos 1. We aren’t conquering. Not even remotely founded in reality. 2. Think of cause and effect. What would we actually gain (or lose) from this aggression/occupation
Imao
Recycling stuff I see
the term is mililtary hegemony
Military Hegemony for what
durr we so strong
our militaries everywhere
dude
your an idiot
hurrrrrr we can waste billions of dollars on bombing u
I’m not against intervention or even military hegemony
you'r
@Smoke should we close our bases all around Iran/middle east and come home?
sure
@Smoke#83smo
why not
lets ignore the facts