I'm not denying evolution per sai, Its just that you guys are using it in the context of undermining identity of objects

which is as present as anything else that IS

In fact JF made the same mistake when he debated Jay Dyer

He said that a squirrel is not a squirrel when being cut in half

It is a squirrel, because we can look It's qualities and determined it was a squirrel

and we can look that it was a "a squirrel cut in half"

Pro Tip: if you take 51% of a squirrel to the bank, they will exchange it for a whole one

a whole one month in the lunatic asylum

Why would you go for something like that?

No brap can escape her toned buttcheeeks

why not

i dono man, i read that and all i really get is 'context matters'

and sure

falling off a cliff is fine too, if you have a strong rubber band tied to you for a adrenaline sport which i dont know the correct spelling of

you are right that looking at things in a isolated way is stupid, because nothing ever really is, but you can hypotheticalize a situation like a isolated squirel and use that idea to get predictive results

bungee jumping?

THATS how you spell it

looking at it now it seems so simple

kek

So This is What The CBS Interview Was Truly About | TPS #648. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJa74JF59tE

and we didnt even need to ask

knows us so well

lol

Hey wassup gamer

Sargon of Assad

gamers

rise up

Wha?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/193569694492524546/669621859133947923/y4ztb7w1nbc41.png

only gamers will get this joke

rise up

rise up

Full Egg Carton

nice shoes