Message from @Ozpin88
Discord ID: 671450188862193670
Aristoteles explained how to create and organize
do usefull things with real things...
makes total sense what scruton says
@virtue Implying that this wasn't common to human nature in general
Plato could only explain moral philosophy.
Plato even avoided practical or technical issues
your introspective worldviews come from how well-of your ancestors were in having them
the only things that Aristotle was good for was his contributions to epistomology and the law of noncontradiction
it's not by reason that you v. asians v. africans (even high iq africans) come to completely different conclusions about ideal organizations
I mean, how huge the gap is, when a language is changed, is easy demonstrate by anglos love nietzsche in all his shiny endless stupidity and idiotic Calender Motti people hurl around as if they were of any value (which they are not)
(if it were by reason it would all be the same? and to the extent that it can you are no longer expressing preferences but methodology)
@The Living Paradox
It doesn't exactly, it wasnt common to human nature..
Humans are limited by common sense,
They need some way of organising or generalising
all human knowledge, philosophy
Without philosophy you can't have any justification for anything you believe in
specifically for race
...philosophy is about organising and generalise all human knowledge.
you don't need justification to trial&error, you just do it, society and law emerges, and whatever conflict resolution emerges and amounts to precedent is efficient. and gets ingrained in your "genetic morals" for lack of a better term
@The Living Paradox
at some point, every society needs to have an intellectual justification
for the neccessary things they are doing.
Common sense only works on small societies
Philosophy is about getting to conclusions of how knowledge is even possible @virtue
thats a very vague definition you gave there
what the sovereign (high) class tells the lower and what works in that communication is entirely dependant on the stock and this domesticated (genetically trained) moral. you're ugh, privileged, and don't even see it. fucking wypipo ugh
theres germanic morals v. french v. anglo v. so many
@The Living Paradox
so basically you say that philosophy is *knowledge about all knowledge*,
If you say its about understanding how knowledge is possible
and understanding how we can get knowledge.
Then basically,*philosophy is a general model for all knowledge and
the methods to use any and all knowledge*
rather it is rational only in the sense that enough people feel the same enough to abide by it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbqhmBKqqy8
i was told this is good
@Ozpin88 Trial and error is barely scratching the surface of level wisdom. You can make a mistake 1000 times and still not get to conclusions without fundamentally questioning the reasoning behind your actions
yeah, so why haven't they? Africa has had >120 iq elites
call me philoafricanist
asia has come to entirely different conclusions about markets and individualism
Technically.. philosophers are trying to have a *general overview*
of all knowledge.
Someone has to make a judgement about what everyone else is doing
why is your rationality not universally coalescing to, well, german ethics?
@virtue Thats a better definition
philos sophos is greek for "can i fuck your student?"
ill answer again, because it's not just reason
it's preference and strategy
morals are largely ingrained genetic strategy and preference
western sovereingty, excellence, truth-over-face, etcetc. germanic being likely best in that front
@virtue There are common forms of action of humans that abide by unchanging principles of existence
market and law - angloid