it'll make your body composition better

@Ed I believe that. But why would nutritional science be?

statistics is mandatory for a bachelors degree here

To make the populous unhealthy and stupid?

where the fuck do you live

>Academia has been subverted
>I'll just accept the consensus of modern day scientists
Something is not adding up here

I haven't started uni yet

oh i see

I know basic statistics

yeah learn that

then when you go to the real world youll end up looking as a brainlet if you cant even understand a table or a graph

Meh it's not directly subverted

It's just that there is a general selection bias against Conservative voices in academia

@Patrick Clifford

reality has a left wing bias

no

Yeah academia is predominantly left wing

no

In the west

where? sociology?

> reality has a left wing bias
@Nerthulas
What do you think of race and IQ?

philosophy?

Humanities, social sciences for starters

Or racial differences in general?
@Nerthulas

History is very leftist

as is anthropology

especially cultural anthropology

The whole ideology of the left is based on egalitarianism to some degree

Wasn't the left really pro IQ testing?

> Responses to surveys of faculty at Ph.D.‐granting departments indicate that 67% of biologists accept the concept of biological races in the species Homo sapiens, while only 50% of physical anthropologists do so.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tea.3660290308

2 seconds

Since often, people would get into positions by virtue of their class rather than ability

Lol when? @Patrick Clifford

so IQ changed that

> philosophy?
@blanc
Even contrapoints conceded that schools of philosophy are essentially leftwing echo-Chambers

@Yev kassem Well, the progressives were supporters of eugenics in the US no?

bruh I am a mod on JF's server

I do not actually think that reality has a 'left wing bias'

Like in the early 20th century

That's why contra quit

The good old days @Patrick Clifford

how can you stand a tranny speaking

jeez