Message from @Ed
Discord ID: 674023452427943955
Well most people don't. Unless you studied statistics, you can't go through all of the data
The real shortcut is just reading the conclusion section from the study
Especially since the academia has been subverted
well
>pls daddy tell me what this means uwu eli5 hurr
@Yev kassem methodology+conclusion
you'll lose weight fasting
and you have more lean weight than fat
so
it'll make your body composition better
@Ed I believe that. But why would nutritional science be?
statistics is mandatory for a bachelors degree here
To make the populous unhealthy and stupid?
where the fuck do you live
>Academia has been subverted
>I'll just accept the consensus of modern day scientists
Something is not adding up here
I haven't started uni yet
oh i see
I know basic statistics
yeah learn that
then when you go to the real world youll end up looking as a brainlet if you cant even understand a table or a graph
Meh it's not directly subverted
It's just that there is a general selection bias against Conservative voices in academia
reality has a left wing bias
no
Yeah academia is predominantly left wing
no
In the west
where? sociology?
> reality has a left wing bias
@Nerthulas
What do you think of race and IQ?
philosophy?
Humanities, social sciences for starters
Or racial differences in general?
@Nerthulas
History is very leftist
as is anthropology
especially cultural anthropology
The whole ideology of the left is based on egalitarianism to some degree
Wasn't the left really pro IQ testing?
> Responses to surveys of faculty at Ph.D.‐granting departments indicate that 67% of biologists accept the concept of biological races in the species Homo sapiens, while only 50% of physical anthropologists do so.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tea.3660290308
2 seconds
Since often, people would get into positions by virtue of their class rather than ability
Lol when? @Patrick Clifford
so IQ changed that