Message from @virtue
Discord ID: 675015738519715872
social justice entrepreneurs
using it as an opportunity to gain status or even money
they naturally become leaders
They want protection and everyone who doesnt protect them is evil
They are not anti status qou, they are against social order
again, they are against a variety of things
yes, social order
They protect a status qou which allow them to beheave as beasts
what beasts
They conform and defend chaotic society
liberalism is not entirely chaotic
and they are compatible with liberalism
they are liberal
socialist want to be beasts at everyones expense
but liberalism ultimately leaves a path to tear down all non-voluntary social structures
and that's why liberalism works so well with capitalism
capitalism, at least ostensibly, is all about voluntary transactions
so while the "leftists" tear down vestiges of the previous social orders, capitalism fills the void
or the void is just left a void
socialism is not well defined enough to make that statement
Socialists in soviet didnt think it sås socialist
Socialism is will defined
i think we can distinguish between equalist socialism and non-equalist socialism
There are many definitions before and efter marx
at least those two
and then further subdivisions may be possible
equalist socialism is the chaotic one
All the versions that works,stops being socialist
Socdem,Only works because its capitalist
define socialism
Soviet union threw planned Economy away as soon as Stalin died,and Stalin used some capitalist details
Wrong
collectivist egalitarianism based om economical materialism
What a sophisticated name for looters
I am biiig gay
Taxes
socialism does not require egalitarianism
Its an outdated understanding of 17th century science mixed with an desire that all men should be the same and have access to plenty
