wrong

let me find more false claims

you made a few

everything is written through the lenses of later people
trying to make sense of earlier people

..it is

the bible is not supported by archeological facts..

there is no place to put a bronze age Isreal
and it has to be the bronze age

b-b-b-but... da Bible told me Israel and Judea were large, powerful kingdoms with many architectural wonders!

Just cause some Fedora Tipping Indiana Jones cant find Gods glory out in that desert doesnt make it not true....

So you deny that judism is a gradual evolution
from polytheistic bronze age societies?
You deny that it rewrote its history
and you deny that jews have recreated
their history post-Roman era?

Jesus is based on the archetype
of a young man that you sacrifice for the harvest

No, it's based on the person depicted.
There is no reason to believe otherwise.
Terminology used throughout the bible is written in a manner that is not implicit but comprehensively precise in it's clarity regarding christ as a person and not made up based on an archetype like a JBP lecture.

I am not saying they are not jews..
you can call the entire middle east Jewish..
they are all semitic people

No.. its an archetype.
We have the same stories long before year zero.

Judaism evolved based on each prophet of judaism that came along and added to what judaism is.

There are the dying agricultural gods
in all agricultural societies..
regardless of what gods they have.

Doesnt have to be Gods..
but it takes so long to say.. .character

It was born in and amomg polytheism

..Judaism is shaped by the first shepherds and cattle based society.
Which makes sense given the stories of the bible

'You deny that it rewrote its history'

who?

what?

where?

the jews..

the stories are oldier.. which indicate they are copied

what jews, the ones who worshipped god or polytheists

People copy traditions and costums.
Its traditonal memories dating back to the stone age.

see you don't make distinctions

and leave me in error

We have crosses since the stone age

When the historians want to find proof of when sweden
became Christian..
they use Christian symbols.
But Christian symbols
like the Cross or the fish
are way older than year zero

these are not proofs of yours, they are flimsy assumptions. Taking a cross as a design based on actual crucifixion is very likely

I feel I am justified as to ask what your objections are exactly.

and not even related to old crsses

they are not flimsy assumptions..

my objections are your assertions that aren't clear, based on your assumptions in regards to inaccuracies in who you are even talking about

what is flimsy ..is to generaly all my previous statement..
pick one.

just because a cross existed before I

x

I did not just copy the cross of jesus

that's an x

and also a cross