Message from @Eternal Entropy
Discord ID: 659851604664516638
..sights...
which is not a guilt admition
you know that logic is about us begining with
information, adding more information
etc
again religion adopts from surrounding cultures and assists in making new also
it's impossible to think otherwise
so I still don't know why this is vital
the Messiah is zodiak sun symbol..
and the character changes a little
but Jesus is dying because he is a symbol of the harvest
and the winder.
the sun raise again so there will be a new harvest the next year.
the body of christ is the bread = wheat
and the wine = also a agricultural symbol
found again and again
yea, you have a stong will to paganize the bible which it clearly isn't and teaches against it's practice
there is a strong correlation between wine and agriculture.
over and over again
this is just terrence Mc'kenna talking points
I see what your intentions are now
there are Christian historians who agree with me.
Christianity represents agriculture
just leave evidence here in a short paragraph please.
I'll check when you have
...huh?
otherwise I see what your intent is and then it's going to boil down too what we want to believe
because no evidence has been clearly given
the wine and bread thing goes back to many different religion.
and they all say that if you consume the agricultural products
you become part of the diety or community
and had you read the bible maybe you might have a comparative text to refute your own beliefs
there are bread and wine cults in mesopotamia
...........
and believe it's all paganism adopted
paganism is just a name..
I read the bible I just dont believe it...
which is obsurd if you know history AND the contents of the bible
then you should readily realize that it's not adopted paganism
the bible is just a single text..
the bible is only valid with other sources..
although some is after the fact adopted by some sects
that I won't deny
for example catholicism is laden with paganism
I can use Cain and abel and back that up
with what we know about stone age shepherds
and then it makes sense.
look
I have to get ready
induction =
similar thing happens..in mesopomian
similar thing happens..in Rome
similar thing happens...in Christianity..
you make the logical assumption that this flow
of event..is all there is
Nothing new learned, I see nothing related to the bible other than this stuff being the neighboring culture in the region the bible takes place.
No evidence is present.
its all related to the bible
because all the bible says is BS
untill it is backed by other sources
and the history and the sciences
doesnt match the fantasies written
down ..not in that exact form.
do you intend to show any proofs or evidences or is it all assumption based on loose connections in which one is required to leap to the conclusion without any intent or action shown in which your claims can be substantiated?