Thats like buying a t shirt that says LAUREN SOUTHERN!

What makes me think what @Dangerlurking

She’s hot tho

Total babe

@Der Jäger Khazar milkers fam

@Fevs the premise is still correct. It's just the tactics that changed. That's the definition of tactics, after all: doing the best you can with what you have

Oh Lawd

Lol

She's a Jew that's been with black guys @Der Jäger GROSS

@Fevs That it dosen't work in todays world?

Her sisters hotter tbh

^^^^^

^^^^

God damn the things I'd do to that thot

Her sister is bae

Coal burner ftw

@Dangerlurking What's the benefit of a leaderless resistance?

@Fevs you can't Rockwell the leader

Keep in mind the only amount of Siege I'm experienced with, @Vice Commander Hunt made me listen to

The anp died with Rockwell

Pretty sure the Southerns are jewesses

@Fevs He didn't exactly call for a leaderless resistance, but he did call for resistance in which everybody can think for themselves, and educates themselves, meaning that if the leader we do have, is killed, we don't all scatter like we did with GLR.

We have so many leaders in TWP that they'd have to kill close to half a dozen people to kill the party off

Rico

Just sayin..........

@Vice Commander Hunt I still find it amazing how well rockwell's work holds up today.

^

If it's decentralized like, say the IRA, any individual part can be arrested/killed without effecting the other cells

if you're going for revolution by terror, then sure I don't see why not

If anything, decentralization has only become *more* effective

But that's not what our party is about

We don't want to take over the American Government

Of course not

The only thing I believe he was incorrect on, is that he predicted that the chinese and russians would launch a black uprising, and would use nuclear weapons against the US, yet that never happened in the violent way that he predicted.

Tbh, the American Government is already under Siege, being destroyed by decentralized minorities and wars sucking it dry

@Fevs I disagree with you on that.

We don't have to destroy the government if it's destroying itself @Dangerlurking

But the fact of the matter is that the US govt won't willingly hand over the reigns to us. Whether we want to be violent is irrelevant.

@Fevs We should be there after the government destroys itself, and we should rebuild what the founding fathers had in mind for the US.

@Dangerlurking I really hope you're fucking joking

I am not stating that we should uprise now, but we need to act when we are at the correct time.