Why would anyone

ANYONE in his right mind

ANYONE who has even the slighest knowledge of the gospel

Go to those places with a purpose beyond witnessing gross perversion?

Honestly they're not all as bad as the Osteen Zone

The message was pretty ok

Some of them are just really big normal prot churches

A big Church, ok

But when, as mentioned, it looks like a stadium

Lol you guys all have a serious issue of conflating aesthetics with morality.

Sometimes they literally are just aircraft hangars with a stage set up, because it's relatively cheap

If I'm wanna witness in a dark stadium with bad music that's my business lol

The Church is meant to be a monument to Our Lord's Heaven on Earth, that is why any Church built before the turn of the 20th Century was built in the most meticulous fashion.

Non-denominational churches tend to prioritize function over form, almost exclusively to their detriment spiritually but financially it makes sense

Glass and Steel, a house to God does not make.

They may as well be Materialists, then, if they refuse to acknowledge to *form* of the divine.

And most megachurches are non denominational

Let me rephrase that, they *are* materialists.

Most modern people are materialists

Seriously

It's a pretty tall claim to imply that you aren't

Not that I would know of course

Materialism is more in and of itself than the love of stuff.

I mean, I wouldn't consider myself one

It's a matter of priorities

When we say materialists, we aren't talking about the sort of people who rush to a Black Friday sale.

Technically we are but not for that reason tbh

To be a materialist in a, uh, less material sense, if you'll excuse the pun; is to deny or be ignorant of the metaphysical realm

And that is the case we are describing here.

Or just to prioritize the physical realm over the metaphysical

Well, yes, there is that, but I believe we're at a point where we have far surpassed a matter of mistaken priority.

This is what happens when you stop teaching the Greeks in school, smh.

The point should be objective, not deconstructivist, beauty when building a church. The pragmatist materialist view is whatever building is empty. The deconstructivist modernist archetecture comes from the materialist who deprioritizes the metaphysical to try to make a physical statement about their own metaphysics at the expense of the congregation for the indefinite period of it's existence.

The house of God should reflect the beauty of his presence in the best way we can, after all, you wouldn’t house a King in a square, same as you wouldn’t welcome him with an electric guitar, specially the King of Kings

Well, yes and no.

Ours is a King who rides a Colt, after all.

*However*.

You are correct, we are building something that is evocative of Heaven.

The Mass in and of itself is supposed to be a glimpse of Heaven.

I don't know if you were on the call when I discussed it.

But I was talking about the Anglo-Saxon architecture of English churches.