congrats, you made a formula, it doesn't mean it exists

yeah fuck your humour

you don't seem to understand that this is not a serious discussion of physics

i'm done

fuck your physics retard

i suck at physics

t. "well ackshually"

If you want to talk physics, do it with me. Not MawLr.

yeah, i'm in house arrest

are you orbited by SIMPs

okay nevermind

@Acrumen yes

alright

works for me

I rest my case

White holes might just be mathematical, but so were black holes for ages.

I'll talk physics another time
I'm pretty iffy on a lot of stuff in physics, especially particle and theoretical physics because I don't know how much of it has been empirically supported at all

for all I know we're extrapolating theories upon extrapolated theories of made up bullshit that only ever existed on paper because the math made sense

I want to practice a healthy degree of skepticism

<:bruh:569616839340982272>

As always

Black holes still are mathematics

We have indirectly observed one

We have inderectly observed a blob of pixels doing.... something

either way, i'm no expert on the subject but one shouldn't really concern himself with theoretical scientists

smug cunts

This is all too far away and too low res to comment on

you can say theoretical physicists are just writing a secular Talmud

Its like those articles about finding planets around other stars!

ikr

All we really know. Is that there is something massive as fuck at the center of our galaxy, that we can't see.

And whats the evidence?
Well, the star kinda blinks at regularish intervals

and le epic science people go <:soy:515271052071534592>

Mathematically we know something is there.

I'll say that observing the wobble of a star, the period of its blinking and the degree to which it does so can indicate the presence of large planets

I see nothing wrong with that

Can indicate

I have a problem with "artist's renditions" depicting what that planet looks like

Its really too far away to tell

And Dasick, they estimate the size of exoplanets by monitoring light output over years. It's not really something we can know for sure because they are ao far away and the light difference is so little. But once you see a large about of data, stars dimming at very exact intervals... you can infer that there is something there.

niggas really be out here guessing what a planet looks like when we can't even precisely pin down its diameter, mass, or orbit