the way I pointed out your hipocrisy

Your contradictions

Your nonsensical assumptions

And you have the nerve to call yourself "rational" and "logical"

Nobody need your retarded theories, based on the glorification of FREEDUMBS

What people need is a true authority that defends virtue

And that puts virtue into the law

And that law stops evil. That is what people need, not freedumbs

@Mozalbete ⳩ can you be more respectful in your discussions? You're both Catholics and both on the conservative side of things. Pointless infighting leads us nowhere.

Oy veeeeey you are going against muh freedumbs!

You really want the stick that bad?

I'm being ecumenical, I just follow what he said

>Self righteousness defense of Democracy
>Hardline, Stern defense of Fascism
>Couldn't agree
Imagine my shock XD

I hate passive-aggressiveness

He accused me of so much I don't agree with

Supporting sodomy and idolizing celebrities

Just a small few

Excuse me, but I wanna adress something said by @Pippin: For what I understand, you pretty much defend technocracy (since you claim the possition of power inside the State should be hold by someone educated in that area). I understand you well?

Yes

I shared this document with the admin I'll share it with you too

It's a small old document stating my political thwory

Theory*

Know any party that defend technocracy?

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tDaTTYHPt4YiOxQ_3q5Y9pY3U8LRZLjDsGP6S34yWWk/edit?usp=drivesdk

It's rough around the edges

Sweet, I'll read it

@Sean/Pippin (INACTIVE) Inventing your own political theory sounds fun until you realize that it's an exercise in self aggrandizement.

Also, education is not an inherent virtue

Our Lord was uneducated, but wiser than any scholar.

At least, uneducated in the classical sense. Education is not only something done through state institutions.
Would the Phd requirement require a reform of the current academic system? Given how corrupted to the core it is?

The thing is I think technocracy will work but only in the areas of the State that need someone educated in that area. For example, it would be understandable having a doctor in the health office, or a soldier in defense office

Also, the only party that I know defend technocracy it's the mexican PRI (Partido de la Revolución Institucional, Revolutionary Institutional Party), center-right and technocrat, but one of the must corrupt political parties in the world and one that crash Mexican development

Give the document a read and tell me what you think

PRI is Left, like the Democrats used to be before they went full Progressive

Also one thing to consider is society has to change from the individual up

Not the government down

They even have politicians in their party accused of crimes against humanity, like the ex governor of Veracruz

@Sean/Pippin (INACTIVE) I read the entire document. I find the system lacking to what already exists as the Catholic Confessional State

(also sorry for my shitty english)

Oh? I'm interested, go on ntr

The importance placed on academics I would judge as misguided. Institutions are products of a people, it's culture and it's religion and they form as a result of their changes, not as a result of the Institution.