>reddit

^

(((Overpopulation goy)))👏🏼

They should hang from the family tree

https://traditionalistreview.com/metaphysics-of-race-and-civilizations/

seems quite weak to me, too vague

Yo

Guys, some may remember that i asked for some help to find a certain saint a while back.
I am happy to report that i finally found the corresponding saint that i was searching for.

I was searching for a certain saint that had written an homily or something on the 'amount' of sin that God will forgive us. It was an homily written by St. Alphonsus Liguori. I want to thank everyone tried to help me back then. There are a lot of versions to be found so this one will suffice.
http://vanitasvanitatum94.blogspot.com/2009/08/on-number-of-sins-beyond-which-god.html

“One boy was forced to stand on a bed in a rectory, stripped naked, and pose as Christ on the Cross for the priests. They took photos of their victim, adding them to a collection of child pornography, which the produced and shared on church grounds.”
-Josh Shapiro, Attorney General to the Commonwealth of PA

Hang them all.

Publicly hang them in St Peter’s Square.

^

String them up.

No mercy.

^ This but unironically.

^

would be interesting to know how related these guys are to modernism and masonry

I guess they're not trad priests or priests that were ordained before VII

too bad the Church doesn't have a very harsh treatment for pedos anymore, as it used to be

v2 isn't the boogeyman, it's a symptom of the disease the vatican has been sick with for some time

hang pedos by the balls

I know

the devil will always attack us

I bet 95% of those are sodomites who proudly wave the rainbiw flag and talk about how proud they are of reforming the Church and the outdated tradition

The Church was already sick before Vat II, Vat II only let the ghost out of the bottle (Dutch saying). And with the people who wanted change suddenly free to to whatever they wanted everything came crashing down.

Because there were changes it gave them an excuse to do so

Are you a Sede @Deleted User ?

nope

SSPX

but I'm conscious about some flaws before VII, especially in terms of politics with the clergy being social-democrats etc (+ modernism being strong after the 40s even with Pius XII condemning the New Theology)

I respect the serious sedes though (but they're rare), since they ask very sound questions that are to be taken into account by the antisede traditionalists

@Deleted User from where is the screenshot you posted

VII may be a sympton, but it is a quite telling one. Half of the transcript smacks of heresy, I believe the term is.

Also.

Isn't it funny, how his Holiness' decree that the death penalty was "inadmissible" shortly after the call for harsh punishment of nonce-y clergy went viral... 🤔

He's an incredibly sneaky Jesuit. The only upside to his papacy is there is now a strong argument for the entire order to be disbanded in the future.

That's not exactly an upside.

The Jesuits haven't always been a crappy order, and not all bad priests are Jesuits.

What I love is the neocon damage control saying everything about it is totally fine if you interpret the documents correctly

Wasn't Ignacio de Loyola reprimanded for being a judaizer or something?