Either that or they die out

More likely the latter.

The reason why the the lib shit community loves gays is because they're all hedonists and narcassists as well

Very true

The good thing is, that if an apocalypse does happen, then their values will die along with them.

Absolutely

Most likely we are heading for some sort of post industrial apocalyptic era. But instead of zombies or nukes. The US becomes bankrupt

Hell, not even an apocalypse. If some right-wing dictator seizes power and decides to mass-execute them, their values will die along with them.

I know that most average people don't care at all about their values, so no one would fight for them

@Mozalbete ⳩ tbh if you're a devout Christian and celibate you're "uncool" or whatever. Not sure for other areas

tbh i don't personally foresee some big cataclysmic disaster where everythign falls apart int he short term

i don't think that's gonna happen for a loooooong time, if ever

i think we're in for the long slow death of the current order

You're right mate. We gotta make it happen.

Ha

Governments and nations can persist a long time on momentum alone

the existing infrastucture and power of the state may be crumbling

but such massive structures take a long time to crumble to dust

or at least crumble to the point where they collapse

we're in for a long slow decline

We exist in a world where weapons that can blow up cities exist, though.

i'm of the view that nuclear weapons will never be launched between states

rogue terrorist act? possible, but highly unlikely

but nukes will never fly, i'm certain of it

Nuclear weapons are Jewish lies

the whole value of a nuclear weapon comes down to one thing

Just like round earth

deterrence

No, I'm not saying they'd actually be launched. All a radical, revolutionary party needs to do is seize a couple of them, and 'the people' won't have a choice in listening to them.

That's never been a factor before.

rogue terrorist acts are a possibility

but nuclear war between nation states isn't happening

islamic nuclear terror

Hell, the caliphate of ISIS could instate himself as the dictator of the US tomorrow if hecould seize a couple nuclear silos. No one would be stupid enough to rebel against someone willing to nuke a city.

Unless they were really fanatical in their beliefs, which the average person is not.

Look at North Korea, everybody hates them, but no one will do jack shit about it because of their nukes.

exactly

deterrence

Yeah, that's what I'm saying though. You don't need to collapse infrastructure if you seize a couple nukes. That's never been a factor in war before.

Usually rebellions have always been long and bloody affairs, because there were no weapons of mass destruction that either side could seize, and, after they did, just have everyone shut up and do as they said.

Hell, some Nazi could literally seize power in the UK, and start sending Jews to death camps, and no one would do anything about it if they just built a couple nukes before they started doing so.