It seems that the Early Fathers are your gods

It is consistent with the attitude of the early Fathers and the primacy that was given to the roman see as succerssor of the role of Peter

You obviously don't know your own magisterium.

You obviously don't even know basic english, so are you going to try to educate about magisterium?

But it is not surprising, considering your gods are the early Fathers :^)

Vatican 1 is clear. The papal primacy and infallibility ARE claimed by the Church Fathers.

So, if that's actually not claimed, Pie IX is wrong.

Claimed does not mean rooted

The root of something is its source

Not when it was acknowledged

Which is why I said "further than that, it is rooted in Christ"

No. It's off topic.

You don't get my point.

Off topic?

It directly addresses what you said

I'm looking for the Pastor Aeternus quote, pls hold on

6. For the Holy Spirit was promised to the successors of Peter not so that they might, by his revelation, make known some new doctrine, but that, by his assistance, they might religiously guard and faithfully expound the revelation or deposit of faith transmitted by the apostles. Indeed, their apostolic teaching was embraced by ALL THE VENERABLE FATHERS and reverenced and followed by all the holy orthodox doctors, for they knew very well that this See of St. Peter ALWAYS REMAINS UNBLEMISHED by any error, in accordance with the divine promise of our Lord and Savior to the prince of his disciples: "I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail; and when you have turned again, strengthen your brethren."[60]

Yes, everything there is true, what is the problem?

Why do you think that the "first among equals" damage control exists?

We agree on what ALL THE VENERABLE FATHERS means ?

To you, who Pie IX is pointing with ALL THE VENERABLE FATHERS?

The early Church, in which you can constantly observe the primacy that is given to the roman see

Actually your church is sharing numerous Church Fathers with the Orthodox Chruch, right ?

You hate catjolicism so much and are so much of a former protestant that it wouldnt surprise me if you wanted to separate the Church Fathers somehow

Ad hominem.

Answer the question, please. Or it's no point to debate.

Im starting to observe some pattern of mental retardation

because I say

It's ok, he's stucked. No problem. Just answer the my question: does your church recognize Church Fathers which orthodox Church recognizes too ?

it wouldnt surprose me if you wanted to separate them

-_-

And im told that I havent answered the questi9n

He isn't answering @Lao Tseu Takedown

Now this cna only be explained by either pire retardation or malice

So which one is it?

Lmao. This is the famous theologian, refusing to answer and insulting of retardation.

the retardation where ypu dont understand simple languahe like "it wouldnt surprise me if" or "according to you"?

or the malice where you know exactly what im saying but pretend you dont?

He loses his temper. It's ok.

@Constantin le Lamantin by the way, YOU didnt answer where I deified the Pope.

@Lao Tseu Takedown You didnt answer