Message from @Mozalbete ⳩
Discord ID: 547835938739322910
What is in Sanhedrin 107?
Wait, no the excrement part is in Gittin
I find the reference very clear. It is no surprise, then, that in some manuscripts, the jews added "the Nasarene" to clear all doubts
FYI they stoned him
Then hanged his corpse
It is mentioned how some said "He is going forth to be stoned"
But the actual execution is always mentioned as "he was ahnged"
וכרוז יוצא לפניו לפניו אין מעיקרא לא והתניא בערב הפסח תלאוהו לישו והכרוז יוצא לפניו מ' יום ישו יוצא ליסקל על שכישף והסית והדיח את ישראל כל מי שיודע לו זכות יבא וילמד עליו ולא מצאו לו זכות ותלאוהו בערב הפסח
The mishna teaches that a crier goes out before the condemned man. This indicates that it is only before him, i.e., while he is being led to his execution, that yes, the crier goes out, but from the outset, before the accused is convicted, he does not go out. The Gemara raises a difficulty: But isn’t it taught in a baraita: On Passover Eve they hung the corpse of Jesus the Nazarene after they killed him by way of stoning. And a crier went out before him for forty days, publicly proclaiming: Jesus the Nazarene is going out to be stoned because he practiced sorcery, incited people to idol worship, and led the Jewish people astray. Anyone who knows of a reason to acquit him should come forward and teach it on his behalf. And the court did not find a reason to acquit him, and so they stoned him and hung his corpse on Passover eve.
Also important:
אמר עולא ותסברא בר הפוכי זכות הוא מסית הוא ורחמנא אמר (דברים יג, ט) לא תחמול ולא תכסה עליו אלא שאני ישו דקרוב למלכות הוה
Ulla said: And how can you understand this proof? Was Jesus the Nazarene worthy of conducting a search for a reason to acquit him? He was an inciter to idol worship, and the Merciful One states with regard to an inciter to idol worship: “Neither shall you spare, neither shall you conceal him” (Deuteronomy 13:9). Rather, Jesus was different, as he had close ties with the government, and the gentile authorities were interested in his acquittal. Consequently, the court gave him every opportunity to clear himself, so that it could not be claimed that he was falsely convicted.
**Deuteronomy 13:9 - New King James Version (NKJV)**
```Dust
<9> but you shall surely kill him; your hand shall be first against him to put him to death, and afterward the hand of all the people. ```
Close ties with the government? Something Jesus Christ didn't have.
Gentile authorities interested in his acquittal?
Jesus refused to conflic with the authorities, taught giving the Caesar what is his, and refused to be an instigator of war against the romans
That's far from close ties with the government
And we don't see them interested in his acquittal from the government
Is taht really your argument?
You are 1) foolish enough to think the jews wouldn't mention Jesus in their book, 2) foolish enough to think they would tell the truth about him
They keep what clearly identifies him
My point is that if they wanted to make this Jesus Christ, they really sucked at making any details correct, and if they were trying to make anti-Christian propoganda here, I don't see how this would have been effective
Do you really think the people who wrote the Talmud had any actual details about these things? Do you think they care about those that they are trying to slander?
This is so effective that they had to censor it
But if they are trying to slander Jesus here, then why did they do it in this manner? No lay-Jew would have known to associate this with Jesus Christ, especially when they change almost everything about him
Many of the parts about "totally not Jesus" in the Talmud are censored. What a coincidence
They directly mention his name, that he was a sorcerer, who had followers, led israel to apostasy and is now burning in excrement along with other great enemies of israel
Who do you think jews teach Jesus was?
They say he was an evil heretic
I'm well aware the Jews suck man
Oy vey goy it's totally another Jesus, we are Jews for Jesus.
The sorcerer who claimed to be God, led others to apostasy, and was rightfully executed in the eve of Passover
And that is what you find in the Talmud
Do they also teach he was a guy that lived in 70BC killed under the Hasmonean Dynasty?
I do not read that anywhere
What are you guys arguing about?
Dude
I just told you the reference
But that is like saying that Jesus isn't referenced by Muhammed because the Jesus he references is the son of the sister of Moses
Sanhedrin 43
And I found nothing
But as I said, details about the date were probably unknown and irrelevant to those who wrote, long afterwards, about Jesus
Isn't there the part where it's stated that Jesus the son of Mary boils in hell in a pool of semen and feces? like, even if you could "refute" the other "Totally not Jesus" parts, i think it's clear there is something against the Christ we preach there, and if there is i would not have any reason why i should not connect the dots that it's not just any Yeshu, but rather one that has a clear connection and it's specified to be oddly similar to our Jesus.