Ever restarted something?

brb i must drive

More like I must drivel. LOL OWNE

whether the flood literally happened or not it doesn't say much for the existence of God either way

Again, the exegesis of some parts or how one or other things happened is irrelevent, since we base our belief in Christ and his ressurrection. And people who try to disprove that by studying them end up becoming christians, like David Wood

I'd say it's important to believe for the sake of believing God is truthful. Maybe it doesn't define the existence of God, but it's a statement on his nature.

Regarding those other things, of all the things that people say there is no evidence today, there is evidence tomorrow, and of some there is, but people ignore it

Start picking and choosing what to believe, you're left with a liar of a God

well belief in God can be conclusively reached through reason regardless of whether you've even heard of Christ or not

this idea that there is no proof is silly, there clearly is

perhaps not any physical or material evidence

And from there Christianity follows naturally

So long as you don't outright dismiss metaphysics <:bruh:569616839340982272>

but it's completely philosophically logical

Yes, once you acknowledge God, Christianity stands as the most rational

@Orrbit let me hear your reasoning

We wave you as example Aquinas' arguments, bruh, but you said that "why isn't da universe the uncaused cause",to which we pointed out that "da universe" is just a collection of things

this ^

what is this? An Image for ants?

as for the flood situation, whatever happened has no weight on the existence of God

if you click it and then click open original you can zoom in

I can still hardly read it

Yeah sure

are you on mobile or pc?

The zoom in double nigerio

im on muh laptop

I am zoomed in all the wy

The image is bigger

at any rate, the existence of God is philosophically demonstrable

if the flood did happen, it's perfectly logical for God to have been able to do it, and if it didn't happen exactly literally as scripture recounts, that's also consistent with God

And those things are not that important, because the centerpiece of Christianity is the resurrection of Christ

Can you tell me what the philosophical argument is

well, the unmoved mover

so, the mere fact that there is something, as supposed to nothing needs an explanation

something either actually is, or potentially is

potential cannot make itself actual, i.e, things need causes

so if everything needs a cause, then somewhere along the line there needs to be a reality which can cause yet is uncaused, or else you end up with an infinite regress

Now from our experiences on Earth, the unmoved mover's premises and even its conclusion, seem to be true
P1) Everything that happens or exists must have a cause
P2) The universe began to exist
C) Therefore, the universe had a cause

In order to prevent infinite recession, one must assume there is a first cause, an unmoved mover. Now this argument alone can be used to justify the belief in an unmoved mover, HOWEVER it does not justify the believe that the unmoved mover is
1) sentient and omnipotent
2) Still in existence
3) Infallible

Those are infered, along things like univity and perfection