Message from @Marcus
Discord ID: 602923642300661771
whereas it would be trivial to prove the point at which the EO deviate
Matthew 5:32
right, so divorce is permissable in case of adultery
1 Corinthians 7:10-11
**1 Corinthians 7:10-11 - Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition (DRA)**
```Dust
<10> But to them that are married, not I but the Lord commandeth, that the wife depart not from her husband. <11> And if she depart, that she remain unmarried, or be reconciled to her husband. And let not the husband put away his wife. ```
1 Corinthians 7:10-11
**1-е Коринфянам 7:10-11 - Russian Synodal Version (RUSV)**
```Dust
<10> А вступившим в брак не я повелеваю, а Господь: жене не разводиться с мужем, --<11> если же разведется, то должна оставаться безбрачною, или примириться с мужем своим, --и мужу не оставлять жены <своей>. ```
@Mozalbete ⳩ you should use the Spanish one
Lmao
1 Timothy 2:12
**1-е Тимофею 2:12 - Russian Synodal Version (RUSV)**
```Dust
<12> а учить жене не позволяю, ни властвовать над мужем, но быть в безмолвии. ```
:^)
Who deleted my biblebot excerpt?
Not me
the whole burden of proof shifting is just showing how little support yall have for this autism
Literally no u
I have to contain my autism
Matthew 5:32
**マタイの福音書 5:32 - Japanese Living Bible (JLB)**
```Dust
<32> しかし、わたしは言いましょう。だれでも、不倫以外の理由で妻を離縁するなら、その女性が再婚した場合、彼女にも、彼女と結婚する相手にも姦淫の罪を犯させることになるのです。```
That's some advanced squiggling
da joo
fears
da samurai
Too bad that guy is an arian
And a cult leader
Neat
Cults are good though
Tfw Daniil is a cult leader :^)
Tfw no kool aid
<:wojak:560839976963670016>
unless spousal abuse, the kind that threatens the life of mother and children, is punishable by death, its cruel to not allow women to leave
and if women are allowed to leave, its cruel to not allow them to remarry in a context where the provider is a man
Coon aid?
Cult reference
But yes
It's a shame that mentality is condemned by Christ, Paul, etc
Keep saying th same things, which are a perversion of Christianity, and I will keep answering
Because you don't even do, as most do, who try to talk only about fornicaiton. You go a step ahead
if only you could answer when such pervesion started
Why is that relevant?