(Non-contradiction, Consistency principle) One in the same and is A priori from deriving the NAP

They can and do predate the NAP

Ownership principle - NAP => lockean ownership

bynecessity

The other half of the pneomaic ethics is the nap

4.) Self-Ownership Principle- A rational actors will, is always extended of the self of the rational actor, therefore owns the self.
this is the NAP as well it's how NAP is framed

the first half predates the other half which is technically the NAP by default

Steading principle -> basically ownership principle...

It's still not entirely the nap

It's just the NAP rephrased?

it's literally derived the same way and come to the same conclusions

Shaman even says that property rights from first principles is the grounding... which is the same as with the NAP

Ayyyyyyy

?

I'm back mother fucker

wb

Workin

Got another job at an auto shop. Tires and oil changes. Easy peasy. $1,000 biweekly.

@Wes The Savage So how is it not the NAP, what makes it different

Fair enough

There is a lot of air and a lot of fluff and traps for opposition, that's all..

I'll concede since I don't have a better argument formed in this case solely

Even though I was arguing doubt

but eh

'Positive human interaction' is undefined and irrelevant to the principles, nor is there a case for how it is to be achieved.

Well I hope I've made a substantial arguing the lack of differences such that it demonstrates the same form the NAP and PE share

guys it's hoppe's birthday

he is no longer 69

Who

Cares

🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕

😎😎😎😎😎

Ive understand what clown world really means!

The meaning behind it is more of a rebellion against modern society!
That is filled with the new moral puritanism...Social Justice!
Recognizing the ridiculousness & retardartion of the modern world.
Especially the highly politically correct, modern world.
Yet simply sitting back on the sidelines, while pointing & enjoying a hearty laugh.

It's self-defeating

How is it exactly

Laughing takes away time and shifts the mind away from the capacity for change.

and it is we who has become the new puritans, we wish for the old world. The cultural liberalism that has been decayed. We must look forward for a new world a world that takes aspects of the mainstream and the counter-culture to reform into a new solution to this dialectic.

Wow! I didn't even notice that! Its almost like a rebellion against a puritanical society that wants you to conform without any sense of originality!

That doesn't mean our position is any better, else it wouldn't have decayed. The world hasn't gone mad, rather we have been left behind. Neoliberalism has taken hold to try to right the wrongs of the past and the reason this movement arose is because we believed that they were either wrong in doing so or doing so through wrong means. We must adapt and understand the failings of the SJW-types and the liberals.