Message from @Johnny Hates God
Discord ID: 618151648572866570
REEEEEEEEEEEEE
What part isn't the NAP?#
1.) Non-contradiction Principle- Truth, must be non-contradictory.
2.) Consistency Principle- Truth must be applicable across all applications consistently.
3.) Ownership Principle- A rational actor owns, which their will extends over.
4.) Self-Ownership Principle- A rational actors will, is always extended of the self of the rational actor, therefore owns the self.
5.) Steading Principle- A rational actor can contain their will into a creation, by using their agency.
(Non-contradiction, Consistency principle) One in the same and is A priori from deriving the NAP
They can and do predate the NAP
Ownership principle - NAP => lockean ownership
bynecessity
The other half of the pneomaic ethics is the nap
4.) Self-Ownership Principle- A rational actors will, is always extended of the self of the rational actor, therefore owns the self.
this is the NAP as well it's how NAP is framed
the first half predates the other half which is technically the NAP by default
Steading principle -> basically ownership principle...
It's still not entirely the nap
It's just the NAP rephrased?
it's literally derived the same way and come to the same conclusions
Shaman even says that property rights from first principles is the grounding... which is the same as with the NAP
Ayyyyyyy
?
I'm back mother fucker
wb
Workin
@Wes The Savage So how is it not the NAP, what makes it different
Fair enough
There is a lot of air and a lot of fluff and traps for opposition, that's all..
I'll concede since I don't have a better argument formed in this case solely
Even though I was arguing doubt
but eh
'Positive human interaction' is undefined and irrelevant to the principles, nor is there a case for how it is to be achieved.
Well I hope I've made a substantial arguing the lack of differences such that it demonstrates the same form the NAP and PE share
guys it's hoppe's birthday
he is no longer 69
Who
Cares
🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕
😎😎😎😎😎
Ive understand what clown world really means!
The meaning behind it is more of a rebellion against modern society!
That is filled with the new moral puritanism...Social Justice!
Recognizing the ridiculousness & retardartion of the modern world.
Especially the highly politically correct, modern world.
Yet simply sitting back on the sidelines, while pointing & enjoying a hearty laugh.
It's self-defeating
How is it exactly
Laughing takes away time and shifts the mind away from the capacity for change.