Social Contracts need to actually exist to be a thing, it's like Stirner's Ego, those acting like they magically exist are disingenuous

Stirners Ego is inescapable; it's just the self

And Contracts do not exist except as constraints on action at the threat of consequence. Social contracts are social constructions. Stirners ego is a 'creative nothing', it is the interaction of material construct whose characteristics are biologically and socially inscribed upon it. In the same way 'society is a spook', the 'self is a spook', in the same way the reality of society is it's individuals, the reality of the self is it's biological geography acted out. That is not to disregard the processes yet to hold it above as something other than an abstraction describing the behaviour of a material construct; to extrapolate and reify the metaphysical and attempt to mask it under an absolutist position seems devoid of reason.

I believe that's his position.

Stirner's still a spook

I get what you're saying, but it does not make him less of a spook

wdym

You've never made arguments against why paying taxes for the military, justice system and environmental protection are wrong.

700 billion or so os spent by the US government to fund military alonr

We can cut that back 350 billion and still remain a world superpower

Spend only 206 billion annually on environmental protection (government investment in carbon capture and nuclear energy as well as reforestation, and guess what businesses can do most of that on their own so I am giving maximums)

And a solid 40 billion on the judicial system (once again maximums

How much would that be you wonder?

596 billion spending annually

Now lets take a look at how much each American would have to spend a year to the government to cover those costs

If we used a flawed everyone pays the same it would be 18k a person annually

If we used the same flawed system for what we have now it would be

12.2 million a person

So you can already imagine how much lower taxes would be

Selganor, wait till you see my budget cut numbers

This is about winning the American vote not a pipedream

It’s about 4 trillion. And when you see what it does get in return, is why so many like it from the left, the right likes the cuts, and then the others never disagree more than halfway

Your ideas would cut 4 trillion?

I’m in vc

Easier to speak then type

Don't fund education

That's my take

Our founding fathers had jobs other than being in congress didnt they?

Yes

Washington was a Weed Farming Whiskey Distiller

What stops them from doing that now?

for one example

What do you guys think of the J3wi$h Question to be honest?

I don't agree with the fascists, ethnostatists and other alt-righters on it, but at the same time, certain minorities of a certain ethnic demographic were the majority of the funders and pushers of the first Bolshevik movements(this is documented), they and a minority of whites control both mainstream left wing and right wing media(alt-righters go REEE when you mention the Caucasoid portions), Paul Krugman was filmed gloating about White people being systemically bullied is one of them, Karl Marx was of that tribe, but hated them with a passion due to being not of their mindset, and having open discussion about the damned thing to dismantle it once and for all will easily get you labeled as an "anti-semite", a "bigot", or censored pretty easily.... it's easy to make anyone who thinks critically hold some small level of suspicion.


Again, I disagree with the racialists and the racists, but there are these other things to consider too.

GG @Wes The Savage, you just advanced to level 4!

Target the structures that provide them such power

^^^ This is what I'm talking about

Yes, he was Jewish descent

If I remember he was anti-semite

isn't there a quote of him saying that the nationality of the merchant was the Ju?

He was Jewish descent, he was the son of a Rabbi and he was a third cousin of the Rothschilds through a grandmother of his.

believe it or not