Message from @Wes The Savage
Discord ID: 617596361315188757
Maybe freaking kenya will be a major player
i dunno
just going off of what i have currently, most likely scenario
Wes you saying your using every possible factor is cringey as hell and just proves my point
No it doesn't prove you anything, you're the cringe one here dude.
Be civil lads
Ooh burn
pls
We don't need to get our panties in a twist over hypotheticals
Im not wearing any panties 💃
Figure of speech
You're more than welcome to think what you want, BUT I'm saying due to various factors that are backed with CURRENT EVIDENCE, it would potentially lead to everyone or MOST everyone launching them at each other, and then you need to consider the certain areas on the world that if were hit, COULD also add to the impact.
There are so many factors to consider in such a scenario
Which are those areas?
adding to the impact
I mentioned supervolcanoes for a reason
I need to tell Thwarted another reason why USA won't let China build a Geothermal Power Plant in Yellowstone
Don't volcano eruptions emit a bunch of dust particles
?
yes
when they erupt?
and ash
and molten rock
Looking at this long term
yeah
assuming a bunch of them erupted
How bad would it be?
let's say 20%
Well, all you need to do with a big enough nuke would be to hit one against Yellowstone and you got a big chunk of the USA covered in ash, unless the nuke blast would incenerate some of the ashes
what's their travel distance?
It'd be ugly
But then there's the question of expending nukes on volcanoes
Sure, in the usa, it kinda makes sense
But where are the most volcanoes anyhow?
It just occurred to me about factoring them in because the US gov is skiddish about even drilling near it for such a geothermal plant being able to make it fire, so I figured I'd factor them into the possible scenario
It would be nice to have less athesmatics(sp?) around
and assuming they were hit. Can the ash from the usa travel to south america or even europe?
Some of them, yes
fuck, the usa has 3 of them lol