And that too

there's always MAD

Theoretically

it's what keeps us in check

But let's think here

I think governments would hold out fine

Same with some corporate bodies

x to doubt

no proof they will for certain'

I think wes is just mentally masturbating over the opportunity to have a blank slate to have a NAP utopia to live in but thats just me

Active assertion with no evidence and being a dick

Your head is too far in the clouds, is that a nicer way to put it?

More active assertions with no proof there bub

Its all a hypothetical so theres no proving or disproving it

So is your fucking position

Now you're being absolutely hypocritical

😂

My opinion?

This isnt a debate

What's the problem? we're entertaining ideas

We're entertaining opinions, what's the big issue?

You're saying my head is in the clouds, but are being hypocritical in this exchange of hypotheticals

We're ALL talking about a hypothetical here

Yeah they're too out there for me

and factoring many things in

And all of this is because the USA wont pay its debt?

No, it's a scenario to consider

Debt has nothing to do with nuclear war

NOW we're fucking confused

@Jeebus theres no problem its just that the ideas have been taken to a place thats absurd and kinda boring to me

We're just adding 1 and 2 together and playing scenarios

i don't understand

whats the debate?

Why is israel and nato and the USA nuking China and whomever back and forth?

It's not necessarily absurd when you're trying to OBJECTIVELY map out as many details to such scenarios as possible.

You may think its absurd to you, but that doesn't make it absurd as a whole.

Or is that the start of the idea

That's Jeebus and I were trying to tell you that hypothetical based on current political pressures

not debts

They have the most nukes. Likely candidates to shoot them. They're not exactly on good terms.

Oh just political pressures?

Yeah