Your head is too far in the clouds, is that a nicer way to put it?

More active assertions with no proof there bub

Its all a hypothetical so theres no proving or disproving it

So is your fucking position

Now you're being absolutely hypocritical

😂

My opinion?

This isnt a debate

What's the problem? we're entertaining ideas

We're entertaining opinions, what's the big issue?

You're saying my head is in the clouds, but are being hypocritical in this exchange of hypotheticals

We're ALL talking about a hypothetical here

Yeah they're too out there for me

and factoring many things in

And all of this is because the USA wont pay its debt?

No, it's a scenario to consider

Debt has nothing to do with nuclear war

NOW we're fucking confused

@Jeebus theres no problem its just that the ideas have been taken to a place thats absurd and kinda boring to me

We're just adding 1 and 2 together and playing scenarios

i don't understand

whats the debate?

Why is israel and nato and the USA nuking China and whomever back and forth?

It's not necessarily absurd when you're trying to OBJECTIVELY map out as many details to such scenarios as possible.

You may think its absurd to you, but that doesn't make it absurd as a whole.

Or is that the start of the idea

That's Jeebus and I were trying to tell you that hypothetical based on current political pressures

not debts

They have the most nukes. Likely candidates to shoot them. They're not exactly on good terms.

Oh just political pressures?

Yeah

and what Jeebus just said

We're not saying they deffo will

But looking at things quantitavely

Not thinking you are

we're playing this scenario out

and factoring as many things REALISTICALLY as possible

even if it leads to scary, uncomfortable, and crazy places

well, SEEMINGLY crazy places

The political parties involved would have to be pro nuclear engagement right?

Yeah its a super crazy place

Not necessarily. If 1 of them is that's enough.