Message from @inkwater
Discord ID: 445435781952176141
but in a positive sense?
It seems weird to me that some professor who's known best for studying Jung would suddenly be consulting for the UN like how is his expertise relevant to the UN here? I have no idea how the UN works I'm just curious.
an mk ultra program but by the good guys
the actual video is here, I had forgot all about this, Autistic Mercury broke this theory months ago before all this recent suspicion arose
beauracracies are so convoluted I've known macro economists who have consulted on mount vernon type projects for final reports on who should be taken to safety duringa a nuclear strike
if you're interested in neuroscience, J.J. Gibson is actually a great read, after this article came out I found a book at a thrift store about Gibsonian neuroscience in the motor-vision-reflex system
a psychoanalyst on migration?
might be obliquely related
yeah that book he mentions about visual perception is good
let me upload it here actually
"The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception" ? great read
the one I found at the thrift store was "Vision and Action" and it has these 3d renders of simulated AI dolphins doing tricks and stuff in it
perception of the visual world
thats sounds insanely cool
Gibsonian neuroscience/psych has giant implications for AI/software/hardware architectures, that's what I work on for my day job
so what should i be reading rn?
http://www.fast-files.com/getfile.aspx?file=161828 :: the perception of the visual world - jj gibson
what are you interested in?
whatever is the most terrifying thing you encounter at your day job
there's some bits in a collection of distributed systems logic papers called "Inconsistency Robustness" about the politics of ontologies, and also that the surveillance/control state is probably going to program/implant biocomputational backdoors into our bodies (if they haven't already) the same way they've put them into computer hardware because it's all signaling systems
yes, there's cheaper copies on ebay i believe tho
I will give this a look thank you
Carl Hewitt's publications since the late 60s are a fucking goldmine
Seems like I'm about to take a deep dive on this
idk your CS/math background but Carl Hewitt's shtick is that his supervisor professors from the AI scene in the 50s were either logicists or connectionists and he started talking to a bunch of sociologists and liberal arts people, ie he swapped Anglo logicism/naturalism for Bruno Latour's sociological theories
my background is logic via bertrand and studying law
ok lmao then this is going to blow your brain
nice to see big brain people in the chat
there's a chapter in there about how legal structures inspired his mode of distributed systems logic
I was gonna bring up that bio backdoor thing up on the sweat but that would have been too harsh of a blackpill
wait so is Godel full of shit
he was an hero
seemed like a sperg
he wasn't wrong his framework was just based mostly on first order theories rather than highr order ones
if you're reading the Hewitt book rn you'll notice the prevalence of Turing's model had a worse impact on the way we think about math/computers than Godel, Hewitt's actor model is a purer formulation of computation than Turing's
this is a bit above my head but maybe I'll give it a read
I bought the amazon copy I'd like to start readin gin hard copy more for my eyez