disagree

I think aesthetic alone has value

just not as much

it does

not

style can be substance in a lot of ways

Isn't that really what most art is?

aesthetic is a headspace

no

the point of art is to allow one to experience emotions and feelings without consequence

i think that was socrates or aristotles theory anyway

i forget who

you must have a purpose behind a piece otherwise its just drawings on a page

no

to whatever medium you are doing

that's just wrong

nah

and claiming that there is anything inherently bad in just drawings on a page is something you need to substantiate

that purpose can be something fleeting like "pretty" or "courageous" but there has to be something behind it

so what's your beef with the picture then

it's just pretty

the intent is to make her look cool

inversion of purpose, irony

that's still a purpose

irony is the same as satire in this situation

whatever its hollow is all

and satire is more than a valid reason

yeah basically

i think it still has value

i don't disagree

ur gay

super gay

https://youtu.be/CgobS-vIX_I

autism

Niggas really be out here debating photos

But no, of art that has an aesthetic but no meaning is still art

The aesthetic is it's meaning

This for example

There is no clear meaning

But even without meaning it can convey emotion

Which makes it art