aallssooo it sounds like uncephalized would aprove of gas taxes but not a blanket tax like france did

It's one of several options.

He even said montanans handle it their way californians handle it their ways

@uncephalized
*"(E)ncourage people to live near their extended families... A* much *easier way to accomplish the same goal is just to tax the fuel more heavily."*
@Just for youtube [NB1]
I'm sorry, ¿do you live in all (or any) of the top 1Ø major cities?

In the world?

or in the US or what

'Encourage' and 'dictate' are not the same word.

In the US first, world second because now your pissing me off by dodging.

LOL

I am talking about a cultural shift

Sure, i live in one of the largest city in the continent

north america that is

And yes I do believe that making fuel more expensive will reduce driving.

*"I'm not gonna fitate where you live, just punish you if you don't live where* **I** *say"* soare me the double-speak.

No, you really are misintepreting.

It's encouragement.

Spending money on fuel to live far from your work or family is not punishment

it's a decision made by the individual

Great, ¿you live in ALL TEN OF THEM?
I said spare me the double-speak, it means stop lying to my face.

they're choosing to spend more on fuel

Yes i live in all ten of them

Just read the wiki article i'm sure it says where they're sold

...
¿Seriously bro? ¿Seriously?

¿Seriously.

You are being intentionally uncharitable to my position by assuming my intentions and filling in the gaps in my positions with what you think I think.

That is on you not me.

I don't even understand your argument anymore Mandatory

Electric cars should be completely at cost parity in the next couple of years.

Just to be clear *if* the goal is to reduce fuel use, my preferred policy would be a revenue-neutral fuel tax that returns the revenues generated from the tax to every resident of the region being taxed, with as little overhead as possible.

Thus not decreasing overall household buying power but incentivizing the purchase of less fuel and items that have less embedded fuel costs.

I'm telling you exactly what you're doing. Don't piss on my head and tell me it's raining, I *AM* being charitable by not blocking you *FIR* lying. I usually do.

@Salacious Swanky Cat
That's a serious possibility, but the electric cars *I* am familiar with don't have the kind of range internal combustion have... ¿Is this changing?

It's raining

You are seriously overreacting, man.

Electric cars can go plenty far

You're both spamming now.

¿Cat?

Nobody is spamming

I don't understand what range you need electric cars to have.

Your argument rests on "alternative fuel" trucks anyways

I will repeat that as far as encouraging people to live near their families and women dropping out of the workforce to raise families I am speaking purely in cultural terms and not about law *at all*. So I'll ask you to take a deep breath and stop misinterpreting me as some kind of authoritarian.

shipping bread doesn't get cheaper when people drive teslas.

Yes. It’s almost standard for newer electric car models to have a rated range of 200 miles or greater.