Message from @Iamma Fa'Got
Discord ID: 585265010025168939
Hopefully that will be good.
I want the end of this to happen.
@Shadows
Agreed.
Its all just a show to distract us for from failing schools, open borders, bankrupt ssi/medicare, aging infrastructure, and general overreach/elitism. None of its real
Also they are hoping you are so tired of the noise you will vote against the orange man hoping it will just shut up
After all, orange man bad
^Tennapel is out promoting his earthworm jim comic book:
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/earthworm-jim-the-comic-book#/
Saw that yesterday, wasn't bad.
I took a gun to Umpqua Community College on Ø1 October, 2Ø15.
Arrest me.
What a legend
I've seen this and a few follow ups, but i was just wondering if people agree with it this nonsense.
it was totally illegal? So they should have been **completely** forbidden from campaigning
Also how do you quanitify shady backdoor manipulation, even if you have a facebook ad, did Facebook place it properly or did the fudge it in a partisan way
I can't seem to find the video he used from LBC talking about the over spending making brexit illegal. Tho the wouldn't over turn it because of those actions brexit wouldn't be thought of as legally binding. But people on the leave side still treating brexit like it was legal.
From the person i'm talking to
"The only reason the 2016 Brexit referendum was not overturned completely due to the corruption and illegality of the campaigning is precisely because it wasn't legally binding, yet the result has been treated as though it was legally binding."
Seems Crowder forgot Knowles (oh wait, he was only listing off halfway decent people 🙂)
What's wrong with Knowles nowadays
@Putz I don't even care about that myself, remind side spend way more then the leave side. It had most of the Uk government, celebrities, the EU, most of the media all telling people to vote remain. So much so they didn't think they had a chance of losing lol.
I want to know what's the point of having representatives who are to cowardly to represent or to disengaged to know their people want change
The ruling class always knows better silly.
_"Bow before your betters boy..."_
Ceaser Nero.
Also trying to quantify the value of media is like them saying trump had the advantage of media coverage in 2016. Which has to be based on any news is good news because reporting him talking about grabbing women 24/7 for 6 months probably isn't helpful advertising
^This is why campaign funds do fall under freedom of speech. you would need an agency to silence people who talk about the campaigns as they would be considered campaign contributions
People should try to understand what citizens united was really about
Also such an agency would inevitably become biased
The only difference is the overspending might have been coordinated, which made it kind of illegal (its what a review broad found), but i was only asking if this made the whole referendum illegitimate to anyone else.
no, the bbc was cheer leading remain. but that doesn't count despite the fact they get tax dollars.
Also, Russia buying some minute number of ads in the USA doesn't make the 2016 election illegitmate