Message from @micamike45
Discord ID: 610821730784509992
Seems oddly appropriate for today
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIk33iz1CiU
If someone applies to be a citizen and they are just a sponge get rid of them.
In summary, Mark Waid is a bad writer.
@DueyBear
I got that in another window. 😉
And one hand on the mouse I imagine.
Crowder brought up several points I didnt know about Epstein, if true make him even more slimy. He also said that EVERYONE wants answers on this except MSM interestingly enough
I had to wait two ***YEARS*** to avenge some random Reddit poster...
That day finally came. (It didn't help I was homeless at the time...)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/M8RmMULe6GE/
I lost brain cells listening to this.
Daily Dosage of Stupid
Schaub's not very bright. He knows fighting that's about it.
@Legalize the reality about climate change is that it's inevitable.
With or without human involvement the climate will change and move out of the Goldilocks zone required for our civilizations to thrive.
I believe humanity has a vested interest in developing technology to terraform or prevent natural climate change, but the mass hysteria, like you said, is definitely overblown.
"Dead" is not a hard line biologically speaking @Legalize
And if you're brain dead why do you need your organs? You're either going to be completely dead very shortly, or you are going to be a zombie vegetable kept 'alive' unnaturally on machines.
I don't think the Bible has any word on what qualifies as technically dead or at what point in the process your soul has left your body.
Do you disagree?
And what is 'the point of death' exactly?
Define it for me.
So people rescuscitated with CPR or defibrillators don't have souls?
Or do their souls come back?
I'm saying there is no 'point' of biological death. Death is a continuous process of shutdown and decay, not an on-off switch.
I don't know current catholic beliefs, but they used to believe that cremated people wouldn't be able to return during the resurrection (that's why they burned heretics I'm pretty sure, and I know that's why they burned one reformist and dumped his ashes into a river). If this is still believed I could understand them not being too ecstatic on organ donation
After what you call death, the stoppage of the heart and lungs, most of your cells are still alive.
My point is that the boundary is determined by available technology, not by a transcendent line.
No, because I'm not talking about the soul. We were discussing biological death.
In that context 'dead' means 'cannot be revived', and that standard *is* based on the available technology.
You are not listening.
But ultimately it is of course your decision what you do with your organs.
I never said He did.
I said that 'biologically dead' is a moving target just like 'viable fetus' is, and it therefore makes no sense to believe that your ensoulment depends on a scientific definition of such at either end of life.
Also I have a very easy time believing that Jesus would approve of organ donation.