he fundamentally doesnt agree with our axioms

im asking why you picked your axioms basically

its hard to have a conversation when we cannot agree on axioms

I think that not standing on 40 million steaming corpses of my own civilians is a pretty good precedent

I looked at history

and was like "huh"

oh so they were subjective

you feel like this is the best choice

theyre objective. they can be observed.

^

no

you can set metrics and measure them

America: Not a steaming corrupt pile of corpses

Russia or China: The opposite

Pretty objective

if I do X, Y will happen can be observed

this is just logic

not morals

If you'll note

my bad

it is descriptive

When you asked me what my morals are based on

lol

not prescriptive

I said logic

jesus dude

yes logic with what goal

if you need help, you can look up a word before you use it

Life, Liberty, Pursuit of happiness

Or, you know

these are you ultimate goals

your*

not 40 million strong starvation periods

theyre overarching ones

Ye pretty much human prosperity is the end goal

Hey, this discussion again

lol yup

If I thought commies were right I'd be a commie just like you

he found a new "nazi" to interrogate lol

im not a commie chill

Tell me Fondy, do you have a moral anchor? From where do you get your principles from?