Message from @Chet Nick
Discord ID: 647847085894402069
Citations needed.
Again, try cracking a book not written by Tom Clancy, you boomer.
Still waiting for your citations.
You, who have read SO MANY books, other than Mein Kampf.
Although there isn't a picture version, so you probably haven't even read that.
This is literal Jr High education, you retard.
Oh, Wikipedia? Now it's on.
It's really not.
You're just going to keep embarassing yourself.
You know, when I was in college, like, 10 years ago, we weren't allowed to cite Wikipedia, since it's retarded.
...and lazy.
>10 years
Lol.
(X)
Ok boomer.
I'll say it's true that's where historically the right and left were at but it doesn't apply to modern day left and right
I've actually done a lot of research into this and looked up several sources on what they consider left and right to be
While also asking around several types of ideology people
From what I can tell, the most common description of "left" describes collectivism while the "right" describes individualism
From a modern perspective
A """bad""" source is still 6 million times better than you mindlessly parroting jews.
Lol. No.
Yes
Nope.
Lol. Nope.
Your views on left and right are an exception, not the rule
Jews invented your ideology. @Unironic Ohio Supremecist
Lol. Nope.
Lol. Nope.
Would love a sauce on any of those retarded assertions.
Sauce?
Lol. Fucking boomers...
Tomato, or Zyklon-B?
The fact that you are the sole person arguing that literally everyone else is wrong and only you stand solely as correct I think should be pretty strong evidence the modern conception of left and right has changed over time
@JoJo, Kомик
Except... that's not what's happening.
Like a ramp.
It's not "literally everyone". It's two Shabbos goys who have never read any political philosophy.
Show us another source, that isn't anti-semitic, which is a modern day reference, which describes the right as authoritarians
Lol. I just did.
My original source.
Also
>not anti-semitic
What a retarded, arbitrary standard.
I declare all of the sources I asked for must be not philosemitic.
Here, let me use an example from someone who was classically on the Left: Bertrand Russell argued that there were Facts, Truth, and Beliefs; each was made up of portions of the other two. The difference between Facts and Truth is that Truth is different based on PERSPECTIVE, since different perspectives have access to different facts, i.e. two men standing on the opposite sides of a river, describing what is on the other side.
Cool. Your example has zero to do with anything.