Ok boomer.

I'll say it's true that's where historically the right and left were at but it doesn't apply to modern day left and right

I've actually done a lot of research into this and looked up several sources on what they consider left and right to be

While also asking around several types of ideology people

From what I can tell, the most common description of "left" describes collectivism while the "right" describes individualism
From a modern perspective

A """bad""" source is still 6 million times better than you mindlessly parroting jews.

Lol. No.

Yes

Nope.

You're the Socialist. @Unironic Ohio Supremecist

Lol. Nope.

Your views on left and right are an exception, not the rule

Jews invented your ideology. @Unironic Ohio Supremecist

Lol. Nope.

Lol. Nope.

Would love a sauce on any of those retarded assertions.

Sauce?

Lol. Fucking boomers...

Tomato, or Zyklon-B?

The fact that you are the sole person arguing that literally everyone else is wrong and only you stand solely as correct I think should be pretty strong evidence the modern conception of left and right has changed over time

@JoJo, Kомик
Except... that's not what's happening.

Like a ramp.

It's not "literally everyone". It's two Shabbos goys who have never read any political philosophy.

Show us another source, that isn't anti-semitic, which is a modern day reference, which describes the right as authoritarians

Lol. I just did.

My original source.

Also
>not anti-semitic
What a retarded, arbitrary standard.

I declare all of the sources I asked for must be not philosemitic.

Here, let me use an example from someone who was classically on the Left: Bertrand Russell argued that there were Facts, Truth, and Beliefs; each was made up of portions of the other two. The difference between Facts and Truth is that Truth is different based on PERSPECTIVE, since different perspectives have access to different facts, i.e. two men standing on the opposite sides of a river, describing what is on the other side.

Cool. Your example has zero to do with anything.

Both see a man standing by a river; one sees a forest him, the other sees a city behind him. Neither one is lying.

The only source I saw was the one referencing how it was described in the 1700's
"Left and right was this hundreds of years ago so obviously that's what we should be going on in 2019" is a really weak argument

I mean, it would be stronger if majority opinion agreed with you
When 90% of the population no longer describes left and right that way in the modern era, I would say it's safe to say the meaning has changed

You're going to have to think for once. @Unironic Ohio Supremecist

> When 90% of the population no longer describes left and right that way in the modern era, I would say it's safe to say the meaning has changed
Sauce

Hell, if were going off that then no one is on the right unless they are 100% monarchist
If we really want to be purist about this

@Chet Nick
Think about your incoherent gibberish? Done. It has literally nothing to do with anything.

@JoJo, Kомик
Lol. Nope.

You're operating based on beliefs, and appealing to limited Facts which suit them, but ignoring the Truth of the contemporary world. @Unironic Ohio Supremecist

@Chet Nick
Lol. Nope.

There's lots of Facts which demonstrate the flaw in your beliefs.

Nope.

Yep.

Again, show me a source that says they don't
I'm happy to show you how other sources that don't agree with your view

However, I'm not motivated to do that to someone too lazy to come up with even a shred of evidence that supports them other than "that's what it meant in the 1700's"

And the fact that you absolutely refuse to present that evidence
And simply rely on childish remarks that are basically nothing more than "no u"
That's not really helping your case

Name one.