Message from @Jeremy-Retard
Discord ID: 648691281622728725
1776 will commence again
Does he not see the problem with his statement? the fact that the scenario requires a government abusing its people and enslaving them?
"Self defense is impossible because it means using lethal force to save your own." ---- Internal thought processes of a progressive.
that's why you gotta start blastin'
the military is going to choose to defend the constitution over a tyrants demands
>lol small militias can't defeat the US gubernment
>ignores vietnam small militias that beat the US gubernment
>also ignores how many military/police will defect
Almost 20 years. Taliban still controls most of Afghanistan outside the cities AFAIK
You almost CANT defeat motivated resistance of native people
No amount of tanks or planes will stop boogaloo-ers from fighting for freedom if they really believe they are right
pretty much
Hey quit Civil War posting
Imagine how much better Americans would be at insurgency compared to poor uneducated middle easterners
not nearly as good
lol, Americans as an insurgency would literally be impossible to deal with.
difficult
not impossible
impossible.
@A. Spader by Americans i dont mean liberals in cities lol
you have such generalized knowledge in the general public. You can't go far before you find someone who knows how to make everything, explosives included.
oh I mean the rural areas too
Iraqi insurgents only suvived because they stole from old military depots from all their wars and Iran supplied some.
as long as the structure of state power (nukes, planes, etc.) remains one sided it would be a bitter fight, but no side would be assured victory
If they didn't have ready-made bombs, they would have had spitballs to use as IEDs.
look up Rex 84
if you don't believe the government is capable of action very quickly to attempt to put down such resistance you're mistaken
How are nukes useful for the govt in an insurgency type situation?
They can what, blow up their own cities?
any large-scale WMD, nuke or otherwise, is too destructive for the gov't to want to use against an insurgency.
Only China has the surveillance establishment to quell an insurgency before it gets out of their control.
USA has the tools, but not the legality to use it that way, even in practice.
China is barely hanging on during good times
if you think that you severely underestimate the lengths the state will take to subvert the law in wartime
Even if they wanted to, they don't know what they're doing. Frankly, the USA's three-letters don't know what the're doing in suppressing domestic dissent as China does.
drones will be able to do arial surveillance of alot
Ya, and again, generalized knowledge in the public negates a lot of that.
it won't get forested areas or mountains as much but of course they'll have 24 hr updates
plus infared tech being what it is, they won't have to concentrate too much
@A. Spader you're right. The govt would do a lot of horrible things and they have a lot of tools to use, but they cant beat 25-50 million armed men spread across the country
if 25 million are fighting, yeah