Message from @yuma_8
Discord ID: 513184111058354177
A lot of the people quoted did it because they were prioritizing other shit, were paranoid about STDs or didn't want to casually fuck in general tbh
Huh, speaking of World of Darkness: https://www.white-wolf.com/newsblog/a-message-from-white-wolf
Apparently they got in trouble for portraying the treatment of gays in Chechnya as a plot point, saying that it was a scheme put in place by vampires in control of the place.
Seems like an odd take to me.
In the case of a civil war, who here believes that someone wouldn't go out of their way to slaughter like swine the government figure that openly advocated for nuking americans?
He'd be pretty high on the list. I would think
Sounds like something one of us would say tbh, should invite him to the server
Lol. It’s a stupid point though
not sure why it would be a big deal, it sounds like a joke (don't have time to check into it).
It sucks as a joke. ‘Give us your guns because safety or we’ll nuke you’. Really?
I can't even find the original statement in order to screen it for sarcasm haha
He got us good, thats for sure lol
Doesn’t even matter. It’s just stupid. I’m not offended; it just shows they have no argument.
I thought it was funny *shrugs*
Joke or not, it definitely doesn't come across as something a lawmaker in a tumultuous political sphere should be saying
umm...is that some kind of weird sexual fantasy she has?
TDS is a powerful disorder
The opposite of Love isn't hate.
she wants Trump near her 🐈 ?
For her to do this think about how often she must think of him.
"from out of her wherever" XD
@RoadtoDawn i'd like to see the context, it could be funny.
@SteelandSouls I don't like that.... Maybe you do, but do you have a problem with when Trump says crazy stuff?
I'm going to act like he was joking. However, he didn't seem to be joking when he said go after people who wouldn't turn in their guns.
Someone needs to ask them how far they would go after people who don't turn in their guns.
I bet you they'd be willing to kill many people.
@Shadows as someone who stands behind almost everything the president says, I can only be logically consistent. Plus when you aren't threatened at all by leftists its impossible to take even serious threats that seriously. He's got nothin'
@grant And that's fair, but they won't like where this fight ends lol
@RoadtoDawn Ya, i wouldn't have a problem with it if it was a joke: Oh you won't give up your guns! Well i guess we should nuke you!
not a great joke, but still a joke.
@Shadows When the war really happens, that's when that nuke comment comes back into play. I think people on the right don't realize how far the left would go. I wouldn't put it above the democrats to enlist foreign powers who would have no problem bombing american citizens. or creating mass death camps.
You can get a gauge of that by who the person is and how they speak on the regular. Trump's a New Yorker. I expect him to bluster. I have no idea who this dude is nor do I have any clue whether hyperbole is in his common vernacular. My take on him is the same take I have on most other politicians. It'd be disingenuous to treat Trump like he is your run-of-the-mill politician. Do I think he'd turn nukes on the country? No. Not in the slightest. Hell, he ended the tweet looking to have a discussion about gun laws. I just don't think it was an appropriate approach. I would treat Graham, McConnell, Rubio, and whatever other congressman or typical politician you can think of in the same light.
SteelandSouls makes a good point as well. Like I said though the nuke part of the comment isn't the part thats a problem to me. Its the part when the guy didn't have a problem with door to door confiscation. and didn't think through how that would really happen.
@Shadows couldn't tell you how many times we've said on here/on the youtube channel to nuke x or bomb y lol
@SteelandSouls I'm not really a fan of treating people differently just because of how they behave, i try to give people the same standard.
You can't exactly raise kids the same way based on how they behave, right?