without a wall, patrols have to be more aggressive

he's got less than 23 months to get his shit together

If he at least started would that change your perspective?

yes - only a moron would expect thousands of miles of wall to be built in that time

https://talkpoverty.org/2018/12/12/truckers-spend-holidays-driving-much-little-pay/

Nothing to do with the subject away hand I just want ya'lls opinions

But he has done vast amounts of good and it sounds like his base is going to turn on him because of this which might hurt us in the future

I can't give one, i won't know what a good wage for these things would be for. I could look into what i think after awhile, but i have way to many unimportant things to do right now!

his entire base won't turn on him, just enough to lose

And that's what I'm worried about

ditto

Fighting for whats Right is almost never easy, most times people are to quick to give up on it.

Well it just seems like a bunch of people thought they were going to get a bit of instant gratification as soon as he was elected

Like the wall was gonna go up instantly and ICE and CBP were gonna start kicking in doors to deport millions of people in a week

It would have been funny (and a little sad), but ya you can't just change government so fast or easy. That's for a good reason also, it makes it so people can't just make radical change just as easy.

I'm saying it would be ashame if so many turned their back on him over my previous point

Indeed

https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/18/politics/bump-stocks-ban/index.html

Serious question: what’s to stop me from being arrested for bump firing with a belt loop

here's the DOJ document on it: https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/537-bump-stock-final-rule/e1f6dad9197d576b4de4/optimized/full.pdf#page=1?action=click&module=Intentional&pgtype=Article

Well I think its already been said as soon as you get a conviction on this it will force a ruling over the definition of machine gun which a bump stock clearly doesn't fit

It’s asinine to call this a machine gun anyway. If you want to ban bumpy bois then you have to write new legislation. You can’t just say “it makes me feel weird because blat blat”

I want to shoot a machine gun. It seems fun

It is fun especially belt fed

@amlam that's the fundamental flaw of the order they are saying well it's kind of a machine gun and you would get prosecuted for possession of an unregistered fully automatic fire arm

~~I’ve shot one before~~

And yeah this way of banning bumpers is the most idiotic and harmful way you could possibly do it

🤔 Do bumpy bois manufactured before 1986 get bant 🤔

@amlam if your belt loop existed prior to the '93 ban on fully-auto's, then you are safe in that regard

My belt loop is pretty new I think. Maybe I’ll go shopping for pre-ban pants at the local thrift store 😂

but srsly, basically any device that makes a semi-auto "effectively" a full-auto that existed prior to the 93' ban is grandfathered in, although I think that it has to be part of the gun itself so a belt-loop shouldn't apply

Yeah well full auto means multiple rounds with one trigger pull so bumpy bois don’t apply but you’ll still get your asshole reamed in federal prison if you get caught with one

the NRA will give you no love on this considering their support of the ban last year

Even people against bump stocks should oppose this because it’s a blatant abuse of executive power

lets see if Kavanaugh doesn't cuck this time

What was it that Blonde and Matt were saying that he did do wrong?

not wanting to hear the ban on abortion funding

He wrote a dissent on Obamacare that classified the penalty as a tax rather than a penalty which cast Obamacare as more constitutional

Also yes

So he's actually as much of a little bitch as Roberts?

yes - that's what I'm hearing elsewhere