Didn’t SCOTUS already address this?
Oh never mind. Heller vs DC was on hand guns.
That’s still a relevant precedence though
California 🤢
They are the enemy.
*proceeds to turn into a giant, saw off CA, and push it into the Ocean*
Its not settled law if you dont like it
🤔 https://twitter.com/IndoBusiness/status/1156082029995417600
*Right...*
https://twitter.com/TheBabylonBee/status/1156297158569517057?s=19
Shark Week Features Roundtable Discussion About Great White Privilege https://t.co/EJrlqhWIWG
wot
That's not what I linked.
https://nextshark.com/akie-abe-japans-first-lady-avoids-talking-to-trump-by-pretending-not-to-know-english-for-2-hours/
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/30/parents-exploit-legal-loophole-to-get-their-kids-more-college-aid.html
I thought about someone potentially doing this when I applied for financial aid, you could also try to be legally emancipated
what are the odds on that Abe story being fake? I'd say 100% Shinzo Abe and Trump were friends before he even went into office.
maybe there was another reason she didnt speak to Trump
https://japantoday.com/category/national/park-employee-didnt-collect-admission-fees-from-160000-foreigners-over-2-12-years-because-one-scared-him
its their ways
what a bitch
Oh no, what will the Republicans do without California? https://twitter.com/latimes/status/1156257087002951680
now that sounds unconstitutional 4th amendment alone makes that sketchy
How does the fourth amendment relate to that?
Republicans should introduce a bill that would require candidates to disclose the amount of native american DNA they have
not some backroom DNA test
Trump's right to privacy
A public one
It's not a search or seizure @Lord Zedd, it's a barrier to public office. I don't think it's under the purview of the 4th
did Bernie end up showing his?
It's still a shitty policy but I don't think it's actually unconstitutional
If its not unconstitutional can they also make you release all your text messages?
Can they also require you to release all your browsing history?
Can they require you to take a test?
Can they require you to fill out a quetionaire?
Can they simply just remove all members of a specific party? to go to the extreme of it
or a specific race?
if this is allowed how do you stop it on other criteria? I'm sure there's something in the constitution to protect against such a thing
Also, how isn't this interfering with a popular vote count?
and can they extend that the other way? can citizens be stopped from voting if they don't release their tax details?
I don't like blocking a candidate for anything other than the constitutionally passed (amendments) barrier.
