While correct not good. Seems we working into escalation. https://analytics.twitter.com/mob_idsync_click?slug=M6dC7VWZnA&idb=AAAAEICJqMz5bIEQEGZ0bJHCRA1ercCKdiT8cngNfpSZ_5P4Oi1l4WD0nmzfgfYqobrTyP4b1gFgntFAwYUOFZt5HbVRI35dYLYuDAqu4N6TlbPF7YPi2rh7Pp3EQd_-O1gdbRynB3GBgxw5WJfLWENLG5REVyKz&ad_tracking=true&tailored_ads=true
Vote https://twitter.com/4YrsToday/status/1155928790519803904?s=09
Originally read that as 9 year old
"If he can hunt with it."
Also lol at that fucking snow monkey. “If only Americans could hear how crazy this sounds to everyone else. I mean freedom and self reliance? Yuck!”
Yes, a 9yo should be able to purchase an AK-47. Glad we're all in agreement.
No, @Goose... Even the MandatoryCarryFaggot doesn't think a 9 year old should be allowed to buy any gun. ¿How's that poll going?
So we're in agreement. 9-month olds should be able to buy assault rifles.
At 9 weeks, all fetuses should be issued McNukes
It’s what the founding fathers wanted
@Mandatory Carry I am the other way around. I don't think mandatory carry is the best idea, but if a kid can carry a rifle then he should be able to pay for it with his own hard earned money.
Also child labor laws are too strict, and they make it almost impossible for a kid to get a job.
And so children grow up and never have to get a job until a few years before they leave home, so they never learn about how to use money wisely.
https://americanmilitarynews.com/2019/07/ca-judge-rules-semi-auto-rifles-not-protected-under-2nd-amendment/
CA...well there's your problem
Didn’t SCOTUS already address this?
Oh never mind. Heller vs DC was on hand guns.
That’s still a relevant precedence though
California 🤢
They are the enemy.
*proceeds to turn into a giant, saw off CA, and push it into the Ocean*
Its not settled law if you dont like it
🤔 https://twitter.com/IndoBusiness/status/1156082029995417600
*Right...*
https://twitter.com/TheBabylonBee/status/1156297158569517057?s=19
Shark Week Features Roundtable Discussion About Great White Privilege https://t.co/EJrlqhWIWG
wot
That's not what I linked.
https://nextshark.com/akie-abe-japans-first-lady-avoids-talking-to-trump-by-pretending-not-to-know-english-for-2-hours/
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/30/parents-exploit-legal-loophole-to-get-their-kids-more-college-aid.html
I thought about someone potentially doing this when I applied for financial aid, you could also try to be legally emancipated
what are the odds on that Abe story being fake? I'd say 100% Shinzo Abe and Trump were friends before he even went into office.
maybe there was another reason she didnt speak to Trump
https://japantoday.com/category/national/park-employee-didnt-collect-admission-fees-from-160000-foreigners-over-2-12-years-because-one-scared-him
its their ways
what a bitch
Oh no, what will the Republicans do without California? https://twitter.com/latimes/status/1156257087002951680
now that sounds unconstitutional 4th amendment alone makes that sketchy
How does the fourth amendment relate to that?
Republicans should introduce a bill that would require candidates to disclose the amount of native american DNA they have
not some backroom DNA test
