Message from @pokemon_fetish
Discord ID: 610276843404394506
It’s also worth mentioning that humans evolved with females as sexual selectors. If you’re not being sexually selective (i.e. being loose) then you’re abdicating your evolutionary responsibility. A loose woman is no different than a dead-beat man and society treats the two the same
The natural selection is strong with this one
When you know a little bit about human evolution a lot of society’s double standards and gender roles start to make a little bit more sense
Except...
Gender roles are socially constructed by the patriarchy you bigot!
It’s true
The most spicy comment so far
Kill all THOTS!
🚁
<:lynBonk:533498055832633344>
When you keep a Twitch membership just for the emotes <:lynDab:548657870779056153>
I enjoy their streams but these are gold
I just have Amazon prime, so may as well get onboard with twitch prime for that free lute
^
Due, @pokemon_fetish...
I'm part jewish, black, and Korean...
WaiTheFuck, *¡¿KOREAN?! ¿How?* 😲😲😲😲
You are what you eat, I suppose
Finish that drywall nigga
What does your head look like from behind? That shit protruding outward on your neck looks like someone tried to make pubes into a rat tail
"Part"
Lol one drop eh?
It's that one drop his mom is upset about to this day
Mrs. Carry should have had a miscarry
wait what
why
Should we warn WalMart?
Well at least the ad hom was aimed at ***ME***. 👿
Anyways…
*“He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion… Nor is it enough that he should hear the opinions of adversaries from his own teachers, presented as they state them, and accompanied by what they offer as refutations. He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them… (H)e must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.”* John Stuart MILL, 𝘖𝘯 𝘓𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘺.
“𝘿𝙚𝙨𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙥𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙎𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙬 𝙈𝙖𝙣 “The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position. … This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because attacking a distorted version of a position simply does not constitute an attack on the position itself. One might as well expect an attack on a poor drawing of a person to hurt the person.” (nizkor[.]org/features/fallacies/straw-man.html)
And on a multiply related note,
“𝘿𝙚𝙨𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙥𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙍𝙚𝙙 𝙃𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜 “A Red Herring is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue. The basic idea is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument and to another topic. … This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because merely changing the topic of discussion hardly counts as an argument against a claim.” (nizkor[.]org/features/fallacies/red-herring.html)
And in closing,
“𝘛𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨: this objection is sometimes used when counsel is "leading" or "argumentative" or "assumes facts not in evidence".” (en.wikipedia[.]org/wiki/Objection_(United_States_law))
jesus thats a wall of text
bro are you literally copy pasting informal fallacy definitions?
do you often ask questions you know the answer to?
My (limited) legal training at work. 😉
Wait, ¿what question?
Sometimes, I have the hardest time understanding mandatory.
we all do
@DJ_Anuz
... ¿Ya ever try asking?
Spicy nuggets are back at Wendys!!
nice!
Is it just me or does r/unpopular opinion have a strangely conservative ratio of users for reddit?
If it was mostly lefties, their opinions wouldn't be very unpopular, methinks
That's true.