Real Irish are genetically hangover proof. You ain't real.

Lol. You've never met a mick if you actually believe that.

Lol. I hung out with a group of em in Krakow on holiday. They just wanted to talk shit about America and sell me coke. They were on holiday for a bachelor's party. Wild fucks.

I keep telling you. Those guys were Mossad.

That's a possibility, tho I'd finger other people before the drunk micks watching rugby

Wait... so you finger banged these dudes?

What else are the Irish for

🤷
Must be a motherland thing. I've never been finger banged.

And you're Catholic?!

Correct.

The two are intimately related in fact.

Every year I live over 25 adds 10% to my hangovers.

Right? Not ideal.

A big part of why I rarely get hammered anymore.

Same.

At 32 I just don't bounce anymore.

Lots of water while you are drinking is really the key to avoiding it though.

Taking B vitamins the night of helps too.

Plus, life's pretty great. No need to dull your senses most of the time.

But at 17 drinks you're going to be hurting next day no matter what you do. That's a big dose.

Indeed.

Agreed, I quit weed for the same reason.

Plus it was giving me anxiety.

Yeah, the biggest issue with the "just drink water" is at some point you get too hammered to remember to do it.

That and if you drink the couple of gallons of water it would take at that point you wouldn't have time to keep drinking between piss breaks.

Hyponatremia rears its ugly head at that point too.

Yup.

But... hangover's gone.

Of course now I have to deal with the shit that made me wanna get plastered...

Feels bad man.

Matt: let the free market decide
Paypal bans pornhub
Matt: how dare you moralize to me

Seems a bit off to me...

it isn't. He's allowed to be upset as a consumer, and try to take his business elsewhere
However
>paying for pornhub

he literally used the first ammedment arguement in the show

as if that applies

The principle of free speech exists even if it's not against the constitutional amendment

If you think it's not okay for the government to oppress us, but it is for the corporations then I'm just going to have to disagree with you even if it's not technically a constitutional issue.

The government just outsourced their oppression to "private" companies

The owner of private property must decide the use of that property, or else it's not private property

You own the fruit of your labor, no one has a higher claim than you- so if you dont want your property used to promote speech you disagree with, you dont have to