law is law

losing touch with reality is the big issue with schizophrenia anyway

schizophrenics are significantly more violent then general population:
"Odds of violent behaviour are reportedly up to seven-times higher in these patients than in the general population."
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366(14)70223-8/fulltext

he said his boss sold it to him

so yes

@C1PHER @Mandatory Carry @Clive I don't have any topics particularly but anything you think the left believes that you disagree with. Also I want to do this in voice chat if it is happening

@Deleted User I can't do voice so im out

rip

welp I am in a different call atm but if anyone will be up late and wants to debate something I will

whats this about?

whos the leftist that wants to debate/

@Clive
That's a bit extreme...

Elaborate

@Deleted User
In a bit...

... I don't even know this as yet unnamed person, ¿and you want me to bring the "do yourself a favor" shit out? At least give him the chance to demonstrate he's worthy of such hatred and malcontent... It's not like I hate people easily...
They have to *earn it.*

"earn"

aka disagree with you

🦇 *ek ek ek ek*

In a relatively rare behind the scenes view, one of us (me) thinks liability insurance should be illegal, the other (Toob) adamantly does not, but we both agree it would be moot under #MandatoryCarry (Section 17, 𝙇𝙞𝙢𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝘼𝙣𝙙 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙫𝙞𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙊𝙛 𝙇𝙞𝙖𝙗𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮).
https://www.theblaze.com/news/california-mayor-force-gun-owners-to-carry-liability-insurance

You think *all* liability insurance should be illegal? @Mandatory Carry

LIability insurance for intentional torts is illegal in many states...

@Legalize it's not that I'm surprised he might hold such a view, it's that he often makes sweeping statements when he actually means narrow ones, and the reverse, so I am clarifying.

And yes, I have read his proposed legislation in full and debated him over it extensively, I'm familiar.

@uncephalized
*"You think all liability insurance should be illegal?"*
Gun liabity only.
@Legalize
And you wonder why I call you dishonest.

And neither one of you read it. I can tell, because I can name an exception so ride for abuse *I fought it for three years.*

Just a thought, hey, maybe ask...
Not you Leg. You'll just waste my time.

"And neither one of you read it." Then how did I spot the error about muzzle length of longarms, @Mandatory Carry ?

Why are you *lying*?

...
@uncephalized...
Go back and *read it* this time. (Hell, *for you* and $5ØØ, I'll write your permeant exemption... I mean, *I'd* be comitting a felony, but...)

What are your criteria for me to prove that I read it? It must be very convenient for you that you get to decide reality for everyone else all the time.

I read the words. I didn't study it intensely, or commit it to memory, but I read the whole thing.

wait, why would it be a felony to give him an exemption in your law?

If you'd *read it,* you'd know exactly which one it is.

Like, *"Oh, crap, he means XXXX..."*

huh? no i havent read it. thats why im asking

Just level man... You read the first paragraph and *skimmed* the rest.

oh he means unceph

He seems to be treating us as one person at the moment.

Do you think I memorize everything I read? I would have to memorize about 10,000 words a day @Mandatory Carry

I read your bill weeks ago

You didn't read it. You *scanned* it.

You are awfully confident.