Message from @Fondboy
Discord ID: 623725686804447245
Obama wanted to veto it
that bill is the review of a perspective deal
not the treaty itself
oh shit
where is that
ah found it
what a dumb name
the article states it plainly
yea executive order
my bad
this doesn't change what is happenign
Under U.S. law the JCPOA is a non-binding political commitment.[151][152] According to the U.S. State Department, it specifically is not an executive agreement or a treaty.[153] There are widespread incorrect reports that it is an executive agreement.[154][155] In contrast to treaties, which require two-thirds of the Senate to consent to ratification, political commitments require no congressional approval, and are not legally binding as a matter of domestic law (although in some cases they may be binding on the U.S. as a matter of international law).[154][f]
I never claimed it was
of course but the point I;m making is that when Obama chose not to radify it as a treaty he opened it up to the next president revoking it on whim
but ending this deal has caused iran to increase its production of enriched uranium
ok here is my claim
cancelling the iran deal was bad
I'm going to ignore you while I talk to Spader if he wants a source he can have one
oh also not only did trump drop the deal but also put sanctions on them too
no the wikipedia page talks about Iran declaring itself out of compliance this year
after the deal was scrapped
"scrapped"
still applies in Europe and elsewhere to my understanding
yes but america dropped it and put sanctions on them. Were they getting money from European countries? I don't actually know.
idk ether
it just mentions the deal included a bunch of other countries none of which had the political motivations to scrap it like the US
again to the best of my knowledge
I mean if they were I wonder if it would be anything close to what they got from america. But not only did america put a dick in their mouth, then they tied them up and put it in their ass too
that's a colorful turn of phrase
what political motivations
different party in power
campaign promise
etc
yea but it was bad is what I'm saying
why
america should have kept the deal
not dogging genuinely curious why you support the deal
lol
because it benefits both parties. the USA can keep Iran harmless (with nukes at least) in order to protect its allies in that area. I think america has sanctions on iran before the deal but that might not be true. Irans government will benefit from the money being returned to them hopefully benefiting the people. Irans people will also probably like america more if we don't fuck them over economically, this leading to progression in that country