Message from @Fondboy
Discord ID: 623724317901062144
Yeah, the deal that was giving Iran money to use to develop nukes.
evidence that they were going that? and it was their money anyway
the UN had people go in and inspect their plants
@Fondboy it wasn't like Obama passed the deal through congress so the single handed thing isn't trumps fauly
It was money that was owed to a country that hasn't existed for longer than I've been alive.
We don't owe them shit.
they were just frozen assets america wasn't using them
also spader congress did pass it
literally 98-1
Obama wanted to veto it
that bill is the review of a perspective deal
not the treaty itself
oh shit
where is that
ah found it
what a dumb name
the article states it plainly
yea executive order
this doesn't change what is happenign
Under U.S. law the JCPOA is a non-binding political commitment.[151][152] According to the U.S. State Department, it specifically is not an executive agreement or a treaty.[153] There are widespread incorrect reports that it is an executive agreement.[154][155] In contrast to treaties, which require two-thirds of the Senate to consent to ratification, political commitments require no congressional approval, and are not legally binding as a matter of domestic law (although in some cases they may be binding on the U.S. as a matter of international law).[154][f]
I never claimed it was
of course but the point I;m making is that when Obama chose not to radify it as a treaty he opened it up to the next president revoking it on whim
but ending this deal has caused iran to increase its production of enriched uranium
ok here is my claim
cancelling the iran deal was bad
I'm going to ignore you while I talk to Spader if he wants a source he can have one
oh also not only did trump drop the deal but also put sanctions on them too
no the wikipedia page talks about Iran declaring itself out of compliance this year
after the deal was scrapped
"scrapped"
still applies in Europe and elsewhere to my understanding
yes but america dropped it and put sanctions on them. Were they getting money from European countries? I don't actually know.
idk ether
it just mentions the deal included a bunch of other countries none of which had the political motivations to scrap it like the US
again to the best of my knowledge
I mean if they were I wonder if it would be anything close to what they got from america. But not only did america put a dick in their mouth, then they tied them up and put it in their ass too
that's a colorful turn of phrase