Message from @A. Spader
Discord ID: 626097944877203467
it was the Whiskey rebellion I knew of
got a patch with the flag and everything
Doesn't war need to be declared for it to be war?
umm
we haven't declared war on a country since 1941
I dont mean via Congress. I just mean in general. Meta
Guess it depends how you define war
If you're a filthy socialist just existing with more than someone else is war
Well you can't declare battle on someone, you can't declare a skirmish, you can't declare a kerfuffle.
I DECLARE A KERFUFFLE
KERFUFFLE ON YOU, AND ON YOU SIR!
WE SHALL HAVE A ROUSING HULLABALLOO
I SAY NAY GOOD SIR
HAVE AT THEE
Viet Nam was never declared... Nor was Korean for that matter...
But ¿who cares about all that right? They weren't *real* wars...
Virgin Police Action vs Chad Declared War
Because body counts don't matter, only *declaration.* 🙄🙄🙄🙄
Every year the USA sequesters about a quarter billion tons of carbon in landfills.
@Mandatory Carry I mean as I Vietnamese living in Hanoi we just saw that as the US now really valuing the South.
For us uneducated 'mericans, where is Hanoi?
I don't remember which side we were on in the Vietnam war. 😓 I guess it's immaterial compared to all the warfare we did.
hanoi was the commie capitol
if memory serves
In Korea and Viet Nam, the south were the good guys.
In the American Civil War, the south were.................................................................. uuuuhhhhhhhhhhhh
misunderstood?
I thought about making that joke
I was going to say something like 'just remember, the south is alwasy the good side.'
i mean
wouldnt be wrong
what is the opinion here on the arms trade act being dropped?
are you talking about the Arms Trade Treaty?
@Fondboy ?
yea that one
I think internationally, as domestically, any attempt to curtail *violence* through centralized control of *weapons* is doomed to fail and is counterproductive.
I'd rather have a robust, open market in arms and a strongly protected individual right to keep and bear arms for self defense and defense of community/state.
so I guess I am predictably against a broad and sweeping ATT
would you make the same argument for those who fail background checks?
ah stopping them here will just make them get one illegally