Message from @grant
Discord ID: 490688309622865922
The whole ‘you don’t understand because you haven’t experienced it’ argument is really just another version of "Feeling over facts" or "speak my truth". I think people in this chat have seen the many body cam videos of black people lying about their "experiences" to know better
Yeah. I watched that video. It was good. It’s hard to bust what amounts to a religious belief.
I'm not sure what the best way to present this is, but sometimes people assume they were treated bad because race when really it was because the other person was just a jerk (to everyone).
Yeah. That’s true.
I just think that more data will help. He doesn’t seem to believe that racism = power + prejudice.
what kind of dipshit buys into that outside of a college campus?
The misapplication of sociological definitions is what plagues brainlets like you and others
the idea is institutional power, which is also bullshit, but the concept of power + prejudice only exists in those dumb classrooms.
at least learn your own dumb shit concepts before you go spouting off about them
yes a black man can be racist, the concept of institutional power has no bearing on weather or not a negro can be a racist shithead.
any time now
Well, I don’t agree with that definition either. I’m just stating that the person I’m debating may not believe it either, which makes the debate easier. Like PSA Sitch said, that definition was developed to defend an ideological position.
it is a misapplication of a poorly thought out idea
>hurrr institutional power (which seems to be timeless)
uh, well that changes
sorry ye I didn't see enough of the argument
No. I understand. Lol.
I was just wondering if anyone had already compiled data to disprove the assertion of systemic racism
Check out the confrontation I had today with La Raza in Pacoima
I just the trailer for the Neil Armstrong movie, the amount of American flags shown in there it's hysterical. They know they messed up
@Salacious Swanky Cat by the way, that PSA sitch video also debunks that privilege + power is a sociological definition, the new definition is purely an activist powerplay move
I agree with him. If it were a sociology definition, then this crap would have been happening decades earlier
Show today yeeeeeee
@grant my YouTube channel Conservative Mexicand
Mexican
you should totally put a link in one of the off topic channels down below
I just had an appalling thought. Do you think that if they get Kavanaugh through, RBG will retire before the midterm??
No. She’ll cling till death.
Hear me out on this
I think that the Democrats were counting on the SCOTUS pick and confirmation making the midterm a single issue election because they have nothing else to run on
if Cocaine Mitch can get the confirmation done, then in Theory the dems have nothing else to run on
I get that, but I think it’s too risky for them. I doubt it would be worth it.
look, the Democrats know that introducing the articles of Impeachment is just the first step. They need a Senatorial Majority for it to mean anything, and would still need 2/3 of Congress to agree on the removal
Good point. They won’t find anything though.
They don't need to. It's political
How likely do you think the “Bluewave “will even happen?
there are a lot of factors to that, and I'm about 50% on iyt
*it
Oh.
I hope it fizzles out. Lol