So, he just insults/shouts down people when he’s losing the debate?

@Salacious Swanky Cat what you just described is every leftist ever.

He less so moves into direct insults and more
>assumes his position is the standard, correct one
>mocks the other position, even if it means refusing to apply even a shred of the principle of charity
And then the stream chat sucks him off

And he's a typical neolib
>let's make an underclass so we can then tax the rich people exploiting illegal foreign labour and then use it to make cheap iPads and give healthcare

Mcdonalds is a 6 figure job in California

Ok. I figured.

lol that's what i was going to say Edgar

6 figure job, 6 figure breakfast

That's one of many reasons why I'm turning it down

Another hearing on Kavanaugh starts at 10:30

Eastern time.

gawd

i thought we were done with this shit

isn't the vote on saturday or something?

i thought i heard shapiro say something about that

It’s a vote to limit debate or something.

I think they are officially voting to send it to the Senate floor

Ok

yo how much do i have to pay to get matt to eat me

?

I am taking a course on the Supreme Court and while reading an article about John Rutledge I came across this passage that oh so well describes what is going on today:

(..)"The Senate, because of that politically inept action but also because of its own concern about
Rutledge’s mental stability, voted down his nomination, 10 in favor, 14 against. The vote enhanced
the authority of the young Senate in the judicial selection process, indicating that it had an
institutional will of its own, motivated in part by the politics of the day. "

Lolololol

I just watched the Juanita broaddrick interview with Steven crowder. Wow. I’m starting to wonder if there really is credibility to the alleged Clinton murders.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Reuters update say senate advances Kavanaugh nominations

Anyone see the last minute plea from Alyssa Milano

1. Her sexual assault story is (as is anyone else's that doesn't Kavanaugh) completely irrelevant.
2. It is very rich to come out and say we should probably have investigated Bill Clinton. Funny how that works! Have principles and stick by them!

Seriously? That’s hilarious.

Sargon did a good video

Sargon kills me

"I'm gonna take a break"

>Proceeds to pump out two of his best vids in months

Juanita Broderick has a much stronger story to back her accusation than Ford does by miles

Its still not clear cut but its way stronger than...this

I would love to see Matt go through this video: https://www.facebook.com/112833696083071/posts/256721901694249/
I find it aggravating, but I can't say why. It _seems_ like there is a lot of half baked ideas, but it is put together so well it is hard to say "this is the part I disagree with"...

It's multiple layers of misrepresentstion

When people criticize #metoo it's because people have already been verifiably witchhunted over nothing

He turns sexual assault into an umbrella term that includes catcalling and "lewd comments"

Puts up "women are doing great" as something to be ridiculed without explaining why

Thank you. I have a friend using this and the idea that because statistically false reporting is such a low percentage that we should believe all women... And it is insidious!

@NewUltraBroad Trevor lacks any awareness of what has come from the me too movement. The mantra of listen and believe ultimately creates more false allegations. Plus, the movement practically states that all men are somehow guilty. Trevor doesn’t understand that removing due process makes the situation worse. He also conflates catcalling, inappropriate touches, and forcible penetration as if they are equally harmful. Half of his point could be used against the metoo movement. There isn’t a rape epidemic in the US. These women are overreacting to something that doesn’t happen to 99% of the female population. It’s ridiculous.

There's a lot more wrong with it, but that's just a few things off the top of my head