@Salacious Swanky Cat er yep, lemme dig up the link...

@B.J. may I have your email? My plan is to send an email to Matt with you copied. @I Know a Fat Guy can do it too. The more people who do it, the better the chance you’ll get in touch with Matt.

He dared to leave the Democrats plantation they have to destroy him by any means or they risk the rebellion spreading

sure. [email protected]

@B.J. Cool. Thanks. I’ll spread the word.

Huh... I can’t find a clip of them actually saying that part, but it was supposedly part of the same CNN Roundtable schtick

Went on and on about him being a token negro and mentally ill etc

Hi all.

I think this will really be the start of the end for CNN

doubt it

Calling Kanye West that will cause many normies pause

Well Kanye been out there for a while

Any chance you guys wanna take this conversation to the call in?

I would but I'm beat. I'm about to go ti sleep
And yeah I'd even go as far as to say he's low IQ, certainly too scatterbrained and not enough coherence to champion the trump cause with efficiency. He's like early stage red pill, not quite at the level to hold his own and BTFO the media

Maybe, but I’m in my shop right now and I dunno when any customers will come in, so...

Now there is gay penguins

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-10-12/gay-penguin-couple-at-sydney-aquarium-fostering-an-egg/10369530

https://youtu.be/qUEy55r49fY

Totally relevant

Not sure if anyone mentioned this, but Crowder said on his stream tonight that he’ll have Jordan Peterson on next Thursday. I can’t believe he won’t press JP about his tweets, so we might get to see that back and forth Matt said he wanted

Is there a need to *press* Peterson on it? I'd rather he be wrong on a surefire win like this than something important. I think really all you'd need to point out is that Kav's lefty crime wasn't the potential supreme court position on it's own, it's the fact that ebil Blumpf picked him.

From the reaction I’ve seen, the biggest turnoff people have about this is that his stance on Kavanaugh seems to be a 180 degree turn from the principled approach he has to other issues. The hope would be that through a back and forth conversation, the real principles of the issues could be addressed by JP

yeah that got me annoyed too (JP)

I don't think JP has necessarily been principled on politics and social issues so much as pragmatic. He thinks there's a correct way forward that involves de-radicalizing people. It's how this is accomplished that will create disagreement, mostly

It’s really just been this one thing that he’s gotten wrong. Oh well

I don't agree with him on a few things, but I had come to similar conclusions to his main ones on my own

So maybe my lack of direct dependence on JBP has lessened the impact

@Beemann what don’t you agree with him on? Just curious. I don’t necessarily agree with him on everything either.

https://archive.fo/s2njX

Imagine my shock

@Wolverine4576 not surprised at all. Lol

It’s those pesky male feminists

Lol. So true. If I were one of the republican senators harassed at the elevator, I’d tell the wamxn ‘that’s what they get for hanging out with male feminists’. Lol

Man lots of stupid today

@Salacious Swanky Cat I keep accidentally deleting when I mean to edit. JBP is religious and stresses religion, I do not and have never been religious. His biblical interpretations are also off from what I understand

His use of Nietzsche, if interpreted as explaining Nietzsche instead of using him to explain JBP's own philosophy, is also incorrect

I also disagree with his assessment of Nazism as "right wing", though I'm also not a fan of the "left-right" dichotomy. I don't think it's consistent

@Beemann I’m religious and I’ve heard of some of his interpretations. They are a bit odd. Sounds nothing like I’ve learned in church.

I haven’t read much of Nietzsche’s work.

I agree that the left-right dichotomy doesn’t really explain political positions accurately. It seems to be more of a tendency rather than an actual explanation of political philosophies. I don’t know.

personally I tend to think instead of the left right more as authoritarian v freedom

Ok.

Consider this question: A key criticism for libertarian philosophy is ‘who’s going to pay for the roads?’. However, I think a better question is have roads as they exist today really improved our lives as opposed to what may have developed with alternative transportation modes, like trains and public transportation.

In short: Have federal subsidies of roads actually exacerbated our condition as opposed to what could have developed if the subsidies weren’t implemented?

The thing is, from what I see, one of the main obstacles to developing infrastructure is governmental interference by way of regulation - and it’s not just with roads, but with things such as telecommunications as well