Message from @Salacious Swanky Cat
Discord ID: 501471105073152010
I told shadow I wouldn’t comment either. I want to so bad now. Grr.
His argument is horrendously full of holes
Well doesnt matter either way, just dont be mean lol
Can’t hold back. I’m internet mean.
i didn't ask anyone not to comment
I’d be to mean if I commented. I wouldn’t curse or say something out right cruel, but I would denigrate his supposed lack of bias.
just that he was in a stream with Friended/Think Club, and was very reasonable.
And its worst then what you guys were saying of Kavanaugh was to be removed over this, if anyone looked at Karan's (a honey badger) blog post. People would start to question the processes of appointing justices, and wonder why we need them at all, pulling apart over very principles of our system of laws (which sadly happens some times, but we need to stop letting it be the case).
Wait seriously? Link it please.
Wait someone would seriously argue that we don't need judges?
Why would the left want judges when they pretty much think that skin color and gender determines guilt?
Its in my comment on the video.
i'm still working on my reply to the guy.
@Salacious Swanky Cat I agree suicide is wrong, but hear me out:
Here in AU where guns have essentially been banned since 1996, suicide _by other means_ has increased
The most popular being walking on the freeway/train tracks and fucking up the lives of millions for a day, and the life of some poor train/truck/car driver for eternity
@Shadows let us review it.
And gonna be honest here, only reason I bring it up out of nowhere is that’s essentially what happened yesterday - apparently some guy walked out onto the freeway, got hit by a car, then a semi; meanwhile, the semi’s attempts to break caused both of its trailers to career off-course and ended up blocking all four lanes of the inbound, subsequently causing further crashes, finally ending up in a pile-up that caused the cops to close off about 5 km (about 2.5 miles?) of freeway
Stephen Hicks' podcast has been launched.
@Deleted User if you haven't check out the video i posted about suicide, it is also from Doc :)
@Deleted User I get that, but that’s more of a call to improve mental health outreach. The AU government is wasting money on woman’s issues. They could spend it on improving mental health outreach.
@Salacious Swanky Cat not sure if you can review it well, i am trying to keep the context of what he is saying in my post, but you would still need to read his reply to me to understand some of it.
Eh... there’s already enough time spent on mental health issues here, I feel
@Shadows Already read it.
I just think there isn’t any persuading someone who’s made up his/her mind, and in that case, wouldn’t it be better to just have it done in private?
Well, that still happens. You can’t dictate how they commit suicide.
Mmmm
@Salacious Swanky Cat I have Faith Goldy closing in on the Toronto Mayor
Neat
Btw didn't hear from matt but thanks for the email
I should have superchated him last night.
She may win?
btw we launched another podcast now that the Quiggin Report is all over the news here. Open College with Dr. Stephen R.C. Hicks #1 - Free Speech; Why The Philosophy Matters
https://soundcloud.com/opencollegepodcast/open-college-1-free-speech
She has a chance. We'll see. another media conglomerate refuses to run our commercials
It seems to be making our campaign more popular. Our lawyers are in court right now
Cool
done, so its a little long, should i just post it? @Salacious Swanky Cat
Where is it?
i didn't submit it yet, you asked to review it heh
Yeah. I’ll read it.
Thoughts in the Crossfire Thank you for the reply, i appreciate you listening to other views.
Now, it matters not if she is lying or telling the truth in our system. What matters is what she can Prove.
I gave you an example of calling someone racist, should a person be fired or not hired merely because of an unproven accusation? If no one can prove a claim, our system does not default to believe the accuser (sadly this is not always true, but that is how are system is meant to work).
So, i want to go over a few problems with your comment, well trying not to take away context.
*confirming Kavanaugh sets a precedent that someone can get through to the supreme court despite a very significant chance they have previously sexually assaulted someone*
The "very significant chance" is just your feelings of the matter, not objective fact.
*This is not a defamation case.*
Well, that's not what you say later on
*If he didn't sexually assault Ford and she's lying about it, it is certainly a terrible thing that he has been defamed as such*
*his reputation is frankly less significant than the precedent this would set.*
What about this isn't about his reputation? If no one has proof of anything and His background was vetted over and over and over by both sides, without these accusations he was being confirmed anyway.